SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Wesley Clark -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: t2 who wrote (1061)1/11/2004 5:04:27 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Time Magazine picks up the story on O'neil...
________________________

Saturday, Jan. 10, 2004

Confessions of a White House Insider

A book about Treasury's Paul O'Neill paints a presidency where ideology and politics rule the day

By JOHN F. DICKERSON

time.com



To: t2 who wrote (1061)1/11/2004 6:53:19 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Message 19679584



To: t2 who wrote (1061)1/11/2004 11:12:02 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Why Wes Clark is on the rise

time.com



To: t2 who wrote (1061)1/12/2004 8:27:49 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
<<...The retired general is counting on a strong showing in the Jan. 27 primary to boost him in South Carolina, Arizona and Oklahoma, among seven states holding primaries the following week.

"He's coming up very quickly; he seems to be touching a chord," said William G. Mayer, a political science professor at Northeastern University and author of "The Making of the President 2004."

Clark's improving fortunes, advisers said, have helped fuel fund raising and left the campaign scrambling to accommodate larger audiences...>>

contracostatimes.com

Clark campaign focuses efforts on New Hampshire
By Paul Schwartzman
WASHINGTON POST
Posted on Mon, Jan. 12, 2004

MANCHESTER, N.H. - The five-day campaign swing had been arranged in detail, everything from a fund-raiser in California to a homeland security speech in New York, to a charter plane to transport the growing horde of reporters following the candidate.

Wesley K. Clark even planned to sneak in a visit with his 3-week-old grandson in Los Angeles.

But with the retired Army general's poll numbers climbing steadily in New Hampshire -- from 12 percent to 20 percent in five days, according to one survey -- Clark and his advisers abruptly changed direction Friday, scaling back the trip and announcing that he would remain focused on the Granite State.

"Something is happening here," said Chris Lehane, a senior adviser to Clark who keeps one eye on the candidate and another on the latest polling numbers flickering across his Blackberry. "We're going to stay here and grow the support."

The decision is the latest evidence of Clark's emerging strength in New Hampshire, where he has stumped for the past week and a half.

During the same time, most of his Democratic rivals have campaigned in Iowa, with the exception of Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut who, like Clark, chose to skip that state's caucuses.

On Saturday, Clark delivered a speech to college students in Manchester, then flew to Wisconsin and North Dakota.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean retains a formidable lead in the state -- as much as 15 percentage points in one survey -- but Clark's support rose by about 2 points a day this past week, pushing him past Sen. John F. Kerry of Massachusetts into second place.

The retired general is counting on a strong showing in the Jan. 27 primary to boost him in South Carolina, Arizona and Oklahoma, among seven states holding primaries the following week.

"He's coming up very quickly; he seems to be touching a chord," said William G. Mayer, a political science professor at Northeastern University and author of "The Making of the President 2004."

Clark's improving fortunes, advisers said, have helped fuel fund raising and left the campaign scrambling to accommodate larger audiences.

A town hall meeting that was scheduled at a middle school in Keene this past week drew more than twice the expected crowd, and was moved to the town's high school.

But Clark's rise has also triggered new attacks, not only from Dean, but also from the Republican National Committee, which a week ago issued two statements dismissing his candidacy.

And it is likely to prompt renewed and more rigorous scrutiny of his record as NATO commander, his evolving stance on the war in Iraq, and his past support for Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.

"The better he does, the more likely the attacks and the questions about what he's done," said Hank Sheinkopf, a political consultant who advised the Clinton-Gore campaign in 1996.

Even with Clark's rise, it is far from certain that he can maintain the momentum. This is New Hampshire, after all, where seemingly strong candidates have been known to crumble at the finish, even though some went on to win the nomination.

Adding to the unpredictability is that Iowa is the first to hold its contest, the results of which have foretold nothing about New Hampshire's. George W. Bush won Iowa in 2000, then was trounced by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in New Hampshire.

"New Hampshire has envy of Iowa for being first. They don't want to have any direction set by Iowa," Mayer said. "It's a very volatile state."

A political novice, Clark entered the race to glowing national poll numbers nearly five months ago, counting on his military record and his Southern roots -- he is from Little Rock, Ark., -- to draw Democratic voters yearning for a candidate who could match up with Bush.

But Clark's inexperience as a candidate led to early blunders, the worst of which was when he said he "probably" would have supported a congressional resolution authorizing war in Iraq, then recanted the statement the next day. In his stump appearances, he often failed to ignite crowds.

Yet, in recent weeks, Clark has emerged with a new, more focused message, one whose mantra -- "I want to bring a higher standard of leadership to America" -- he seems to recite at every other turn.

The moments that draw the most applause are his sharp attacks on Bush, whom he chides for failing to capture Osama bin Laden and for taking the United States to war in Iraq.

"I don't think it's patriotic to take us into a war with Saddam Hussein that we didn't have to fight," he told an audience in Bedford this past week.

After spending the latter part of December in Southern states, Clark landed in New Hampshire on New Year's Eve and had the state much to himself while his opponents were mostly based in Iowa.

Clark plans to spend $1.8 million in New Hampshire, most of it on television advertising. The campaign has sent "American Son," a 15-minute infomercial about Clark's life, to 50,000 undecided voters in the state. The piece was created by television producer Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, who made the same sort of video for Bill Clinton in 1992.



To: t2 who wrote (1061)1/13/2004 9:14:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Clark's N.H. progress dogs Kerry

boston.com



To: t2 who wrote (1061)1/14/2004 10:17:43 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1414
 
Families should keep more of their earnings

By WESLEY CLARK
GUEST COLUMNIST
Wednesday, January 14, 2004
seattlepi.nwsource.com

Working families are the backbone of America. But on George W. Bush's watch, they're being squeezed from all sides.

Property taxes, insurance premiums and college tuition are all way up. The typical family's income has decreased by $1,500. While working families' bank accounts have shrunk, the president has worked to make the richest Americans richer. This year, Bush is giving the top 0.1 percent of taxpayers -- those making more than $1 million a year -- an average tax cut of $127,661.

Meanwhile, in millions of homes across America, hardworking parents are wondering how they'll pay their bills and clothe their kids. At the same time, the fortunate few are enjoying the lowest tax rates since World War I. We need to restore fairness to America's tax system.

That's what my Families First Tax Reform Plan will do. It will make the tax code fairer, simpler, more progressive and more pro-growth -- without increasing the deficit by one dime. Under my proposal, families of four making under $50,000 will not pay one penny in federal income tax, and all families with children earning up to $100,000 will get tax relief. In all, 31 million American families will keep more of what they earn, so they can pay for health care, education, and other pressing needs. That's what I call putting families first.

Too many families are having trouble making ends meet. I know how hard this can be. My father died when I was nearly 4, leaving behind $450 in savings. My mother had to raise me all alone. She got a job as a secretary in a bank and worked hard every day just to provide the basic necessities.

When you work so hard -- in the wealthiest country in the world -- you shouldn't be struggling to get by. That's not right. But that's the reality of Bush's tax system. It's a system stacked against working families and the hardest-pressed Americans.

Family First Tax Reform will make the tax code fairer. It gives all families making less than $100,000 a standard $2,250 tax credit for each child.

The plan will also restore progressivity to the tax code. A generation ago, the top tax bracket was 70 percent. Today, under Bush, it's half that. Family First Tax Reform will make sure that millionaires pay their fair share in taxes and it will reduce the tax burden on working families -- putting about $1,500 back in the pockets of a typical family of four.

Family First Tax Reform is also pro-growth. It will reward work by building on the Earned Income Tax Credit, which will help millions of America's hardest-pressed families to pay for child care, transportation and other work-related expenses.

Under the Bush administration, more than 545,000 children have fallen into poverty. Families First will help hundred of thousands of parents lift their children out of poverty. Most working families with children will pay no income taxes at all.

The plan is fiscally responsible -- it will not increase the federal deficit by one iota. Relief for working and hard-pressed families will be fully paid for by closing the corporate loopholes that currently let companies squirm out of paying their fair share. And by a 5-percentage point rate increase on income of more than $1 million a year, affecting only the top 0.1 percent of taxpayers; 99.9 percent of taxpayers won't pay one dime more in taxes.

My proposal improves and simplifies our tax system. Families First Tax Reform will make the expensive, confusing and time-consuming ordeal of filing taxes into a do-it-yourself exercise that takes only a few minutes. Families will simply fill out an easy-to-use three-line form, listing their income, marital status and number of children. More than half of families won't even need to file a single form.

For years now, Republicans have campaigned under the banner of tax reform and family values. But for them, tax reform is all too often a cover for giving big tax breaks to the richest Americans. I think it's high time that someone stood up for what's right. This is a plan that really values families. That's what I'll do in the White House.

_____________________________________

Former Gen. Wesley Clark is running for the Democratic presidential nomination.