Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (522731)	1/12/2004 7:11:11 AM
From: George Coyne	Respond to of 769670

....nor was he an imminent danger in the near future. Are you sure you know that tomorrow is after yesterday? ROTFL!

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (522731)	1/12/2004 3:47:42 PM
From: Gus	Respond to of 769670

LOL! You're hapless! I already dismantled your flimsy bottomline which you based on a proven lie that you merely parroted from other useful idiots. Now you now want to compound that embarrassing mistake by making an absolute statement about the future? <font color=blue> The bottom line is that Saddam was not an imminent threat. And since this was the reason given for attacking Iraq, it is now shown to be baseless </font><font color=red> Saddam was not an imminent danger, nor was he an imminent danger in the near future. </font> Grow up! Why don't you listen to Clinton rationalize about why he did not accept the Sudanese offer to turn over Osama Bin Laden to us in 1996 when OBL was already an imminent threat to the US. You might finally learn a thing or two about what imminent means before it is too late. newsmax.com