SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sylvester80 who wrote (34844)1/12/2004 1:30:14 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
You will notice that despite your headline...O'Neill says he never "saw" any evidence of WMD, not that Bush had none as you claimed.......moreover, given the circumstances of his termination, O'Neill has no credibility with people with rational minds (which is probably why you find him so exciting)....

JLA



To: sylvester80 who wrote (34844)1/12/2004 5:27:58 PM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
More importantly the facts as ONeill gave them are backed up with solid data of transcripts of those meetings and the author of the book that interviewed O'Neill has others that contributed to it. He just hasn't mentioned them as yet. O'Neill was the one to speak out and he is taking it on the chin.

Nothing speaks the truth like things in writing and transcripts of what was said in the National Security Meetings and that's what we have now. All the rest is hearsay........or can be misconstrued as hearsay and sour grapes but having the actual documents...that's great.

Suma