Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (522963)	1/12/2004 3:43:22 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"but he did not take a nation to war" Because he was all show and no go. If the international community and the U.N. were a bit more in agreement about Saddam, the war could have been avoided. But rather surprisingly, there are a lot of countries that supported him. We shouldn't let them set U.S. policy imo. "anymore than several administrations, dem or rep, took us to war to remove Castro," For the most part, Castro has not been as dangerous as Saddam. When it appeared that he was (Cuban missile crisis), Kenedy was prepared to go to war with the U.S.S.R. And his aggressive action is what AVOIDED war. Too bad so many in the world would rather appease than make a stand.