SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (24061)1/12/2004 7:13:20 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 793671
 
<<DIANE SAWYER: (You) stated as a hard fact, that there were weapons of mass destruction as opposed to the possibility that he could move to acquire those weapons still —
PRESIDENT BUSH: So what's the difference?>>

I can see President Bush's point.



To: E who wrote (24061)1/12/2004 7:39:37 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 793671
 
So what's the difference?

Message 19683435



To: E who wrote (24061)1/12/2004 10:26:53 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793671
 
So what's the difference?


He was short with her, because he was right. It's like raiding a criminal's house for Drugs, and finding that he has moved them just prior to your raid. Doesn't make him any less of a criminal, and the raid should have happened. You are so "anti-war" that you refuse to see it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News