Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (8879)	1/12/2004 10:09:29 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10965

Actually the ivory tower liberal snobs are for Dean. Most loiberal colege professors polled are for Dean, for instance. That's the old-fashioned liberal hand-wringer. Hey look, dean is an impressive guy (for Vermont), he's just not the right candidate to run against Bush. Everyone knows Bushies ae salivating at the thought of getting Dean to run against. He would be more or less easy for Bush to beat. Probably a cakewalk. Dean's only advantage is a zealous far-left base similar to Nader's but that will hurt hm as much as it helps him once swing-voters see that many Deanies look and sound a little wacky. The majority of gays for instance support Dean because of his strong stance for gay unions. That's poison in the general election though. Dean won't even have a chance in key states like Missouri. Face it, we can do a lot better.