Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5678)	1/14/2004 11:46:47 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

One cannot infer that the violent removal of lots of people, who weren't involved in 9/11 and had no connection to it, wasn't the best way to prevent another 9/11, because WHO KNOWS To anyone who knows anything about the region (take Tom Friedman, for example) it is evident that Saddam's removal was a critical step in eliminating future threats of terrorism (you have to get past his liberalism, he IS a journalist -- but he does, nevertheless, understand the Mideast better than just about anyone, and he clearly has believed the removal of Saddam was critical from the outset). There are knowledgeable people out there who hold a position different from my own, you just don't happen to be one of those people. As I said, you're too closed-minded to comprehend any of this stuff. You're iggied.