SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D. Long who wrote (24264)1/14/2004 6:00:21 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793859
 
Some more Military news for those interested.

ARMORED WARFARE: Iraq Survival Tips

January 13, 2004: American troops in Iraq have quickly developed procedures and tactics to counter road side bombs and ambushes by hostile Iraqis. This has made attacking American convoys a lot more dangerous to the attackers, and reduced U.S. casualties considerably.

First, the convoy should have at least five vehicles and they should have extra armor plate or Kevlar blankets attached to protect the crew. The troops in the convoy should carry lots of ammo for their weapons (this means a dozen or more 30 round magazines for each M-16, and as many 200 round belts of ammo for each light machine-gun and several dozen rounds for each M203 40mm grenade launcher.) Get some AT-4 bunker buster rocket launchers if you can. Rig up ring or pedestal mounts for light or medium (7.62mm) machine-guns. If you can get .50 caliber machine-guns, install them on ring mounts in the lead truck.

Your largest truck should be in the lead, ready to push through a roadblock if that seems likely to work. The lead vehicle should have an NCO or officer trained to make quick decisions on whether to drive around a barrier or push on through. Troops should all be assigned a direction to watch while the convoy is moving. A training area has been set up in Kuwait where troops in moving trucks can practice firing at targets. If ambushed, convoy troops must know to get out as much firepower at the enemy is (or is likely to be) as quickly as possible. The Iraqi attackers are usually not very disciplined, and their attack often falls apart if it is met with heavy fire from the trucks.

It's also important that convoys check with the commanders of areas they are passing through, to let them know when the convoy will be in the area and to get radio frequencies and other information so the convoy can call for help from local troops if there is an ambush. The local commanders can also often arrange to have any of their troops or aircraft (including UAVs) escort the convoy for part of the way. The local commanders also know better who the bad guys are in their area and often have information on where ambushes or roadside bombs might be. It's common practice for combat units to have a QRF (quick reaction force) ready to go at all times to help one of their patrols, or a passing convoy.

Military Police often escort convoys, usually forming the advance and rear guard. The idea advanced guard is two heavily armed hummers moving 300-500 meters in advance of the convoy. The advance guard checks out suspicious items (possible roadside bombs or men waiting in ambush.) If possible, another two hummers should follow the convoy by the same distance, for Iraqis have attacked the rear vehicle in convoys with machine-guns and RPGs. For this reason, the last vehicle in the convoy should always be one with armed troops facing the rear. If someone suspicious appears from the rear, blast them. The rules of engagement in Iraq have been aggressive, allowing troops to shoot when in doubt, even if an innocent Iraqi gets killed from time to time. This also encourages Iraqi drivers to stay a respectful distance from American convoys.

American trucks move thousands of tons of material along Iraqi roads each day. Most of it is moved by troops who do this regularly. These troops receive training before they are assigned to convoy duty, and are briefed before the convoy moves out. On any day, only a few percent of the convoys out there will encounter any hostile behavior (usually rocks thrown at them.) Actual ambushes are rare, and the combat troops and MPs are always looking for roadside bombs and armed Iraqis trying to set up an ambush. Most of the roadside bombs and ambushes are discovered this way, and neutralized. But it's only because of these careful preparations that the American casualty count has been kept so low. The Iraqi attackers suffer far more casualties. American intelligence knows this because they monitor the fees the attackers are often paid to make these attacks. Week by week, Iraqis demand, and get, higher fees for attacking American convoys. It's a risky business, and American troops want to keep it that way.

COMBAT SUPPORT: How MPs Evolved into Combat Troops

January 14, 2004: So many American Military Police are needed in Iraq that the MP companies that have long provided security for military bases are being replaced by civilians. For seven major bases, some 1,500 civilian security guards have been hired, at about $14 an hour to replace MPs who normally guard entrances and perform other security services. Many of those hired are former or retired MPs, and all have gone through a one month training course. The civilian companies receiving these contracts have long provided security guards for federal buildings, so the program is not that full of unknowns.

The Army has also called some 10,000 National Guard troops to active duty to provide additional security for Air Force bases. This sort of thing is how military police were obtained until World War II, by just taking soldiers and appointing them as military police. Everyone learned on the job. During World War II this changed, as military police were established as a separate branch and formal training programs were established. One of the major needs for more military police was traffic control, as larger armies, now using thousands of trucks, required professionals to control the traffic and keep it going. Some 200,000 troops served as military police during World War II.

After World War II, the military police took on new jobs. In Korea, and later Vietnam, military police were often called in to assist with keeping the peace among local civilians in war zones. Military police have never given up that peacekeeping job. Also during Vietnam, the military police took over the job of organizing security for supply convoys that traveled through hostile territory. After Vietnam, the army incorporated military police in its combat planning, making them, in effect, combat troops. In peacetime, MPs act mainly as police (at military bases) and provide security for the bases. In addition. they train at their wartime tasks of dealing with civilians and guarding convoys. This is why MPs already had some armored (M1114) hummers before the Iraq war and were prepared to deal with civilians and guarding convoys. But there is not an enormous need for MPs in peacetime, and most MPs (59 percent of the 37,500 available) are in reserve units. These reserve MPs are well prepared, because they spend nearly all their training time on wartime tasks. But they don't have the armored hummers, bullet proof flack jackets and additional weapons found to be necessary in a "hot" combat zone like Iraq. For the last six months, there has been a hasty scramble to get the needed equipment to the combat MPs. The army is now converting thousands of National Guard and reserve troops to MP units. Initially, mostly artillery units are being converted, because more accurate artillery and smart bombs has enabled fewer guns to do more work. Thus fewer artillery units are needed.

The principal unit for military police is the company, containing 160 troops and fifty vehicles (mostly hummers, including the M1114 armored hummers.) MP companies tend to acquire as additional weapons (machine-guns, sniper rifles, shotguns) and equipment (especially nigh vision gear) anyway they can (officially and unofficially.) This is an old tradition, as some World War II MP companies ended up with a few extra armored vehicles and mortars. Although women are not allowed to serve in combat units in the army, MP companies have contained female troops for decades. As the combat role of MPs increased, no one thought to remove the women. This was because the women were doing the job as well as the men.

January 13, 2004: The United States Army revolutionized the training of ground combat troops in the 1980s with the development of MILES (laser tag) equipment for infantry and armored vehicles, and the use of MILES in a large, "wired" (to record all activities) National Training Center (NTC) in the California desert. Other countries soon realized the importance of these innovations and a few built their own NTC clones. One of the best of these is in Israel, the Tactical Training Center (TTC) at Ze'elim. In addition to wide open areas for the training of armor, infantry and artillery units, there are several villages and urban areas wired for training troops to fight in close quarters.

U.S. troops have trained at the TTC for over two decades, but this is usually done in secret to avoid diplomatic problems with Arab nations. American Special Forces and commandoes are regular visitors to the TTC, to look into new Israeli techniques and compare notes.

Israel is now offering to allow foreign armies to train at the TTC, for a fee. Despite all the international ill will Arab nations have generated against Israel, this has not slowed down Israeli weapons exports. Many nations will probably be eager to pay for some time at the TTC. The training there will probably include advice from the Israeli staff that run the place. Running troops through the TTC is the next best thing to actually getting combat experience. This was the major benefit of the original American NTC. The exceptional performance of U.S. Army troops during the 1991 Gulf War was largely attributed to the realistic training exercises they had gone through at the NTC. The media didn't pick up on that in a big way, but professional military types world wide did.
strategypage.com



To: D. Long who wrote (24264)1/14/2004 8:35:50 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793859
 
The Senate is going to give us more close races than anything else we will deal with, IMO. And I love to follow them. Here is an early NRO pick.

January 14, 2004, 8:29 a.m.
Aiming for the Hill
Two more Senate seats for the GOP?

By John J. Miller

This year's field of Senate candidates has come into much sharper focus since my previous reports in September and July. And that means it's time to make a few predictions.

But first, the big picture: Republicans control the Senate with 51 seats. If President Bush wins reelection, they can afford to lose a single seat and stay in charge, with Vice President Cheney breaking ties. If the Democratic nominee prevails, the GOP has no margin for error.

In November, 34 states will elect a senator. The Democrats are defending 19 of these seats and the Republicans hold the remaining 15. Few of these races are truly competitive — I've kept an eye on 18 of them, using a fairly generous standard of what makes a race worth watching.

It's still very early in the cycle, but I'm ready to begin making a few guesses: three GOP takeovers, one Democratic takeover, and four tossups (for two seats now held by Republicans and two by Democrats). If my assumptions are correct — and this isn't a money-back guarantee, folks! — then the likeliest scenario would be for the GOP to gain a pair of Senate seats and increase its majority to 53.

Herewith, my quick analysis of 18 races:

ALASKA: Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski and former Democratic governor Tony Knowles appear to be headed for one of the closest elections in the country. Murkowski may deserve a slight edge because she'll share the ticket with Bush, who is strongly popular way up there. TOSSUP

ARKANSAS: Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln might have been vulnerable this year, but she hasn't attracted a strong challenger. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

CALIFORNIA: Former Republican secretary of state Bill Jones has just announced his candidacy against Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer. He probably would have been the GOP's best candidate for governor in 2002, but he didn't do well in the primary. This time around, he'll face competition from the right (former assemblyman Howard Kaloogian) and the left (former U.S. treasurer Rosario Marin). As a mainstream, pro-life Republican with a proven record of statewide electoral success, he remains the GOP's best hope for beating an incumbent Democrat. LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

COLORADO: Republican Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell's path to reelection became much clearer when Democratic congressman Mark Udall said he won't run for the Senate this year. The only remaining question is whether former senator Gary Hart will get in the race. If he does, the contest will attract some national attention because Hart was once a favorite among Democrats to run for president. But he's also a has-been who won his last Senate seat in Colorado (in 1980) with only 51 percent of the vote. The state is much more Republican today. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

FLORIDA: Will Republican congresswoman Katherine Harris get in the race? The smart money says she won't — and that she'll wait to challenge Sen. Ben Nelson in 2006, when memories of her role in the 2000 election will have receded and when the White House will be much more enthusiastic about her candidacy. The GOP frontrunner now is former HUD secretary Mel Martinez, but the primary field is crowded and Martinez will come under attack for his trial-lawyer past. The Democrats will endure their own bruising nomination fight. LEANING REPUBLICAN TAKEOVER

GEORGIA: In one sense, Republicans already have captured this seat: Retiring Democratic Sen. Zell Miller votes like a man who has switched parties in his heart. A couple of Democratic candidates finally have surfaced to replace him: Mary Squires and Nadine Thomas, both state senators. Perhaps they think that running and losing will boost their prospects for future office. The winner of the GOP primary between businessman Herman Cain, Rep. Mac Collins, and Rep. Johnny Isakson will be the heavy favorite. LIKELY REPUBLICAN TAKEOVER

ILLINOIS: This election remains the Democrats' best chance to pickup a seat currently held by a Republican and state comptroller Dan Hynes appears well on his way to winning his party's nomination. The GOP's best hope would be for state Sen. Barack Obama to upset him in the primary. LEANING DEMOCRATIC TAKEOVER

LOUISIANA: Democratic Sen. John Breaux's decision to retire leaves Louisiana with what will be one of this year's most-watched Senate contests. The race will feature a pair of congressmen: Democrat Chris John and Republican David Vitter. TOSSUP

MISSOURI: Democratic state treasurer Nancy Farmer recently made national headlines — sort of — when Hillary Clinton cracked a Gandhi joke at her fundraiser. This wasn't the sort of attention Farmer was hoping to attract in an uphill battle against Republican Sen. Kit Bond. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

NEVADA: Democratic Sen. Harry Reid might have been vulnerable this year, but the GOP won't field the kind of candidate who can knock him off. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

NORTH CAROLINA: Republican congressman Richard Burr has a money advantage over Democrat Erskine Bowles, who benefits from the statewide recognition he received for running against Elizabeth Dole in 2002. A new poll has Bowles in the lead, 45 percent to 40 percent. This could be a real nail-biter. TOSSUP

NORTH DAKOTA: This is another state where Republican might have hoped to do well — except that their best candidates have chosen not to run. Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan appears poised for reelection. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

OKLAHOMA: The retirement of Republican Sen. Don Nickles creates a pickup opportunity for Democrats, though not without a tough fight. Democratic congressman Brad Carson has raised nearly twice the cash as former Oklahoma City mayor Kirk Humphries, who just learned that he'll face a distracting challenge in the GOP primary. TOSSUP

PENNSYLVANIA: Robert Bork has endorsed Rep. Pat Toomey in his GOP primary challenge against Sen. Arlen Specter. Despite this, conservatives are far from united in the effort to unseat one of the Senate's most liberal Republicans: The National Rifle Association recently came out for Specter. Democratic congressman Joe Hoeffel waits in the wings for the GOP to settle its intramural quarrel. LEANING REPUBLICAN RETENTION

SOUTH CAROLINA: Former Republican governor David Beasley promises to say whether he's running in the next week or so, and all signs indicate that he'll get in. If so, he probably becomes the frontrunner in a GOP primary that already features former attorney general Charlie Condon and Rep. Jim DeMint. The Democrats almost certainly will nominate schools chief Inez Tenenbaum. LEANING REPUBLICAN TAKEOVER

SOUTH DAKOTA: Polls indicate that when GOP congressman John Thune challenged Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson in 2002, about 20 percent of South Dakota's Republicans voted for Johnson on the theory that it was better to pull the lever for the man in the Senate majority. Thune lost by a whisker. Now the Democrats aren't in the majority and Thune is taking on Tom Daschle. The race will be close — and if Thune loses, Republican will grumble that he should have run for his old House seat because the Democrats stand a good chancing of winning it this year. LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

WASHINGTON: In a state where Democrats outnumber Republicans (45 percent to 40 percent, according to Gallup), Democratic Sen. Patty Murray must be considered the favorite against Republican congressman George Nethercutt. A new poll (by the Democratic proxy group EMILY's List) puts Murray well in the lead, 48 percent to 26 percent. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

WISCONSIN: Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold lacks a credible GOP opponent. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION
nationalreview.com