SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : FISH FARMS NEED TO BE THE SIZE OF COUNTRIES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (17)1/14/2004 3:12:34 PM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 405
 
I agree that is something that is necessary, and inevitable otherwise we will have people fighting it out with guns on the seas. It looks like we might be shutting down a good part of the grouper fishery here on the gulf, and whoa nelly that is going to be a brouhaha.

Here in Florida it took a constitutional amendment, but we finally got some control over the matter. I remember going out with my dad on a $10 head boat when I was a kid, and catching 8 kingfish of 15-25 pounds between us (we were poor then and ate kingfish every day for a long time).

Then there was a period where you couldn't catch squat. No fish, no bait, nothing.

Once we started regulating the inshore waters, it bounced back very quickly, not to where it was thirty years ago, but good enough.



To: maceng2 who wrote (17)1/14/2004 5:01:41 PM
From: Kenneth Kirk  Respond to of 405
 
At the end of the day I am suggesting a world council who has authority for fishing

Hopefully it won't be as political as, say, the International Whaling Commission. Or for that matter UNESCO, WHO, EU, or even the UN itself. But the reality is, it would be, and reasonable scientific analysis of the situation would take a back seat to political pull of certain nations, emotional appeals, radical environmentalism, greed....