SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (176544)1/14/2004 5:47:57 PM
From: Qualified Opinion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Leading edge 300nm manufacturing equipment unit costs more than the 200nm equipment unit.



To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (176544)1/14/2004 9:17:22 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
The number can be revised up in a healthy market, just like it was revised down several times during the bust. If INTC has revenues of around $30B for '04, and spends only $3.8B(midpoint of estimate) on capex, that is only 12.6% of revs, well below the long-term average of mid-teens to low 20's in terms of capex spending. IOW, they would probably have to revise up if market conditions remained strong. The number simply cannot stay down there at that level too long should INTC want to remain at the head of the pack.

INTC is only in the position of being enormously profitable because it spent large sums (7.3B in '01) to stay ahead. I do not think this lesson will be lost on competitors.....or for INTC for that matter.