SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (524381)1/15/2004 10:01:36 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769670
 
Determined to serve

By VINCE DEVLIN of the Missoulian

Cary Monbarren, at his home in Missoula on Wednesday, talks about some of his experiences in Iraq as a staff sergeant with a National Guard unit. Monbarren, who has been deployed in Iraq since April, will return in a few days after a two-week leave.

Former Marine recruiter went the extra mile to get to Iraq - now, he's going back

For five years the United States Marine recruited young men and women from western Montana to join his branch of the service. His desire to become an officer led him from the Marines to the Army Reserves in 2002.

About the time America invaded Iraq in 2003, two things happened. His unit was called up and sent to Fort Carson, Colo., to help deploy troops from there. Meantime, people - mostly teenagers - he had recruited, were being shipped to Iraq to fight a war.



For Staff Sgt. Cary Monbarren of Missoula, there were no two ways about it.

"A lot of kids I put in the Marines were being sent to Iraq. I couldn't sit here in the states and watch them go. I had to be a part of it," he says.

He jumped through a lot of hoops and, he admits, "probably burned a lot of bridges." But he arranged a transfer to a Nebraska National Guard unit that was about to be deployed to Iraq.

Last April, days after the U.S. began bombing Iraq, he arrived for a three-month tour of duty.

Which became six months. Then nine months. On Jan. 1, Monbarren came home to his wife, Melissa.

He leaves for Iraq again Friday. Nine months has become a year, and his brief trip home is strictly R&R.

Monbarren has watched rocket propelled grenades shoot past the windshield of his truck, and sat in one of Saddam Hussien's marble hot tubs. He has baked in 130-degree days, and shivered through 30-degree nights.

He has eaten a pound of sand in Iraq's fierce sandstorms, bathed in bug repellent, and shared a meal of rice and goat leg with villagers.

"Best food I've had since I got there," laughs Monbarren, who lost 30 pounds in Iraq.

He'd do it all again in a second.

"Watching the news on TV while I'm home, it's kind of strange," Monbarren says. "It's all about how many people died today, how the Iraqis don't want us there. But when you're on the ground, it's a different story. You should see the look of little kids when you give them water. You see people cheer when you drive through their town. It's very different from when I first got there. We're out building schools now, getting medical help to people. It's not all about what got blown up today. We're doing good stuff."

Monbarren is the supply sergeant for the Nebraska National Guard's 1057th Transportation Company. While his job before deployment was, one way or another, to get his unit what it needed, be it size 16 combat boots or 50 plastic water cans, his duties are now many and varied.

He's worked security at a chemical plant and hauled an Egyptian doctor around the countryside.

"I've helped train Latin American troops in convoy operations," Monbarren says. "That was interesting."

It wasn't just that the Salvadoran, Dominican and Honduran troops spoke no English, and Monbarren spoke no Spanish.

Many of them had never driven a vehicle of any kind before.

"Try training someone who's never driven, to drive a 5-ton truck using hand signals only," he says. "That's an experience."

His unit spent time with the Multi National Division in Al Hillah, near the ruins of the ancient city of Babylon. There, he met troops from Poland, Rumania, Slovakia, Hungary, the Philippines and Mongolia.

"It was like being in the U.N.," Monbarren says.

"One of the great things about being in a transportation company is your job is to move troops and supplies around," he says. "So you really get to see the country instead of being stuck in one place."

Many units fly their state flags over their tents - although Monbarren's outfit flies not the Nebraska state flag, but a Cornhusker one - and he says he's run into countless Montanans on his journeys across Iraq.

"From my very first day there, when I get off the plane and right there in front of me is Lee Haldorson, who I used to work with in the recruiting office in Missoula," he says.

At one point, when his unit received an overshipment of ice, Monbarren hauled the extra treasure out to give it away and spied a Montana flag. Turned out to be the 889th Quartermaster Company out of Great Falls.

"Cat fan or Griz fan?" Monbarren asked the soldier in front of one of the tents.

"Um, Cat fan?" the soldier answered.

"Sorry," Monbarren said, pivoting away.

"No no no!" the soldier cried. "Griz fan! Big Griz fan!"

The 889th got the coveted ice.

While they've had close calls - "One thing about the Iraqis, they're terrible shots," he says - Monbarren's unit has sustained no casualties. One soldier did have to be shipped home when he came down with Leishmaniasis, a parasitic disease transmitted by the bite of sand flies. The bites, Monbarren says, "spread and never heal. You end up with huge scars. If you get it internally, you can end up with lesions on your organs that can kill you."

Sand flies and malaria-carrying mosquitoes are a constant worry.

"You bath in bug repellent and sleep under a net," Monbarren says. "You spray the nets, you spray your cot, you spray your body."

One of the people in his unit brought along a 5-inch DVD player - "You ought to see 30 guys try to watch a 5-inch DVD player," he says - and one night Monbarren was trying to watch it from across the tent, through both the netting and the crowd.

"This giant shadow came across my face," he says. "It was what they call a camel spider. It doesn't have a mouth, it has a beak."

With a 2-inch wide body and 5-inch long legs, it can cast an impressive shadow for a spider (although it's neither spider nor scorpion, but belongs to its own order called solifugid).

"For entertainment, guys like to catch a camel spider and a scorpion, throw them in a bucket and let them duke it out," Monbarren says.

Taking the scorpion to win is usually your best bet, he adds.

Melissa Monbarren saved Christmas for her husband. Due back on Jan. 2 for his leave, Cary bought presents for her everywhere he stopped on the long trip home to go with his big gift, a digital camera.

In Iraq, he got her a T-shirt that reads "Harley Davidson Baghdad - Opening Soon."

In Kuwait, a coffee mug that says "You bastard, you sent me to Kuwait." He also bought her gold there, and some beautiful Egyptian blown glass (that survived the 7,000-mile trip home, but a crushed Melissa accidentally dropped the day after she opened it).

They didn't let him off the plane in Crete, but in Germany he purchased a beer stein for her. In Portugal, a colorful ceramic chicken.

And in Baltimore, he got her the best present of all.

"I was supposed to go from Baltimore to Atlanta to Dallas, lay over there, and get home on the second," Monbarren says. "I was going through customs, and there was this lady in front of me who had a box with a Missoula address."

Monbarren asked the woman if she was from Missoula. She was. He asked if she was doing the Baltimore-Atlanta-Dallas layover-Missoula trip. She wasn't.

"I'm flying directly out of Baltimore as soon as I clear customs," she told him.

"There's a place there in the terminal where you can turn left and go into the regular terminal, or turn right and stay in the international terminal," says Monbarren, whose plane was continuing on to Atlanta. "If you go left, you can't get back in."

Monbarren turned left and followed the woman to the Northwest Airlines ticket counter in the hopes they'd have a seat.

They did - but it would cost him extra to change his ticket.

"I told them, 'I don't care; I'll pay anything to get home tonight.' "

Then they told him what the extra charge would run him: $900.

"I'll pay anything but that," Monbarren said.

Fortunately, a Northwest Airlines employee a little higher up in the hierarchy overheard the exchange. She asked Monbarren where he was coming from.

When he said Iraq, she not only waived the $900 surcharge. She upgraded him to first class.

Monbarren dashed to a phone and called Melissa.

"I won't be home tomorrow," he told her.

"I just freaked out," Melissa says. "Then he told me he'd be home that night."

"That was her Christmas present from Baltimore," Monbarren says.

He got home at midnight. They celebrated Christmas right then.

Two days later, on Jan. 3, they had Thanksgiving dinner.

"I've gained back 10 pounds since I've been here," Monbarren says. "We've been to every restaurant in town."

Northwest Airlines not only got him home a day early, and in style - a stewardess even gave him a bottle of wine and two wine glasses to help him and Melissa celebrate his return - it also found him return tickets on a different airline that let him extend his stay by a day.

"It's getting close to the countdown," Melissa said Wednesday. "I'm getting very emotional. But my job is to support him and take care of things at home, so he can focus on his job as a soldier."

Before they married, on Aug. 18, 2001, Melissa says her then-Marine made it clear that if America ever went to war, he'd be going.

"Even if he wasn't in the service at the time, I knew if there was a war he'd join up again," she says. "It hasn't been fun and I wouldn't recommend it to anybody. But I'm so proud of him. How many people can say they've been part of the liberation of a country from a ruthless dictator?"

"I think it's going to be tougher to leave this time than it was the first time," Monbarren says. Melissa agrees.

And what's he taking back to Iraq?

"Maybe a McDonald's wrapper with a grease spot on it," Monbarren says. "A little scratch and sniff action. And pictures of snow. I'm definitely taking as many pictures of snow as I can."

missoulian.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (524381)1/15/2004 10:16:36 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Senator Kennedy, You Can't Handle the Truth

by Angela J. Phelps
Posted Jan 15, 2004


To a cheering crowd at the Center for American Progress here in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, the distinguished Sen. Edward Kennedy (D.-Mass.), spoke as "an American deeply concerned about the future of the Republic." Standing between two American flags, reading from a teleprompter, and beginning his speech with fond remembrance of America's founding fathers and the ideals that transformed thirteen colonies into the country we are today, he looked very . . . presidential. So much so that if I didn't know better, I would have thought that the aging politician were running for office himself.

"I believe that this Administration is indeed leading this country to a perilous place. It has broken faith with the American people, aided and abetted by a Congressional majority willing to pursue ideology at any price, even the price of distorting the truth. On issue after issue, they have moved brazenly to impose their agenda on America and on the world. They have pursued their goals at the expense of urgent national and human needs and at the expense of the truth. America deserves better. The Administration and the majority in Congress have put the state of our union at risk, and they do not deserve another term in the White House or in control of Congress."

If this isn't the beginnings of a great speech, I don't know what is. And if the eight (thanks for playing Carol Moseley Braun) presidential candidates don't do some creative cutting and pasting into their 2004 playbook, or Blackberrying job offers to Kennedy's speechwriter, they would be fools.

Thankfully, as of this moment, the senior Senator from Massachusetts is not running for office. And maybe that is the very reason that he felt bold enough to make such strongly worded statements directed toward the Bush administration. On the other hand, maybe he thought that the Democratic candidates needed a little help knocking those pesky above-average Bush job approval ratings down a few percentage points.

From Sen. Kennedy's point of view, it would seem that President Bush's first term in office has been ruthlessly corrupt, an absolute failure, a masterful cover-up of the truth; and if he wins another term, it could mean the end of American civilization, as we know it.

According to Senator Kennedy, President Bush's worst offense thus far has been in the area of foreign policy. (No brainer there -- although I haven't seen it, I would assume that this is Talking Point #1 in the DNC's playbook.) Kennedy said that the President employed "misguided ideology and distortion of the truth to take the nation to war. In doing so, the President broke the basic bond of trust between government and the people." He went on to say that "If Congress and the American people knew the whole truth, America would never have gone to war."

I happen to think just the opposite is true. Do you really want the truth? As Jack Nicholson so eloquently put it in A Few Good Men, "You can't handle the truth." Because the truth is, if any American lived a single day under the former dictator of Iraq, they too would have been screaming for regime change in Iraq.

Besides that minute detail, I assume the Senator is referring to the fact that weapons of mass destruction have not yet been found. But does this make the President a liar and a man who has broken faith with the American people? If that's the case, then the Senator should be making similarly strong statements about President Bill Clinton, and the members of the United Nations, who also believed that Saddam Hussein was working on WMD and was a threat to his neighbors and the world. Just ask the Kuwaitiis.

And speaking of the "truth," let me refresh the Senator's memory of a few facts. The United Nations in 1999 concluded that Saddam Hussein had biological weapons sufficient to produce over 25,000 liters of anthrax, the materials sufficient to produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, and the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. I should have him speak with my friend Dr. Katrin Michael, an Iraqi who still suffers today from the effects of Saddam's environmental "clean air" policy that he issued in June 1987 as he released bombs containing mustard gas and cyanide in the Kurdish region of Northern Iraq.

But don't just ask her. Now that Saddam Hussein has been removed from power, we're daily hearing the truth from the people who lived under his malicious and tyrannical rule. Are they, too, misleading us and distorting the "truth"?

According to Sen. Kennedy, America's only chance for survival is change here at home -- in the form of removing President Bush from office and replacing him with a Democrat in the Oval Office. In his words, "The election cannot come too soon." But which of the Democratic presidential candidates could save America from the peril that we currently find ourselves in? After all, the economy is in a successful recovery, progress in Iraq is moving along relatively well, and according to the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll, 59 percent of Americans approve of the President's job.

Maybe Sen. Kennedy is rooting for the unpredictable, hot-tempered, and proudly religious Gov. Howard Dean? Or maybe the radically pro-choice "until the moment of birth" General Wesley Clark? Or maybe his fellow Massachusetts comrade, the X-rated "Did I expect George Bush to f*** it up as badly as he did?" Sen. John Kerry?

In my opinion, none of the current eight candidates have what it takes to confront the problems or the issues that face our country in the aftermath of 9/11. Actually, I take that back. The only one who comes close is Sen. Joseph Lieberman who I can proudly say is the one Democratic candidate exhibiting some common sense with regard to Iraq. In the recent primary debate in Iowa, he said, "I don't know how anybody could say that we're not safer with a homicidal maniac, a brutal dictator, an enemy of the US, a supporter of terrorism, a murderer of hundreds of thousands of his own people in prison instead of in power. To say that we haven't obliterated all terrorism with Saddam in prison is a little bit like saying somehow that we weren't safer after WWII after we defeated Hitler because Stalin and the communists were still in power."

Sen. Kennedy, the next time you want to blow off some steam, please spare us the partisan half-truths and melodrama. If you're really seeking the truth that will save the American people, here it is: President George W. Bush, although not perfect, has proven that he can, in fact, be trusted with the future of the Republic.

humaneventsonline.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (524381)1/15/2004 10:20:15 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Why does Kenneth E. Phillipps lie and libel the President??? What in the joint resolution passed by the congress is false. Why does Kenneth E. Phillipps lie and libel the President!!!!

The Joint resolution tells the American people why we ended the murdering of so many Iraqis.

HJ 114 RH

Union Calendar No. 451

107th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. J. RES. 114

[Report No. 107-721]

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 2, 2002

Mr. HASTERT (for himself and Mr. Gephardt) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

October 7, 2002

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[For text and preamble of introduced joint resolution, see copy of joint resolution as introduced on October 2, 2002]

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in Public Law 105-235 (August 14, 1998), Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in `material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations' and urged the President `to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations';

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolution of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 (1990) and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 (1991), and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949 (1994);

Whereas in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1), Congress has authorized the President `to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolution 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677';

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),' that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and `constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,' and that Congress, `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688';

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to `work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge' posed by Iraq and to `work for the necessary resolutions,' while also making clear that `the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable';

Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and

Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002'.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS.

The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to--

(1) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and

(2) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--

(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and

(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--

(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and

(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

(c) War Powers Resolution Requirements-

(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

(a) REPORTS- The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 3 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338).

(b) SINGLE CONSOLIDATED REPORT- To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93-148), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- To the extent that the information required by section 3 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of such resolution.

Union Calendar No. 451

107th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. J. RES. 114

[Report No. 107-721]

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

October 7, 2002

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

END