SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (180648)1/16/2004 1:55:43 AM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572580
 
I am describing my friends who were born with 80 or 800 million dollars, asking them to help pay for the wars, the public schools, the failing hospitals and the rest. Not too much to ask. Why does Bush give away so much of the peoples' money to those who need it not at all in a hundred lifetimes? That is the greatest mystery. No other country in the world does this. And in the 90's when we raised taxes on the rich, the rich actually got richer, richest, richer than ever. A lesson for the GOP to learn. Without a strong middelclass, no one really wins. As of now. Bush can beaten on one isue, the fact that he has given away 700 billion dollars to those who don't even need it or want it. And that has created ZERO jobs. Trickle down does not work.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (180648)1/16/2004 8:56:21 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572580
 
That's right, it's a democracy, not necessarily a socialism. What you are describing would make the French proud, not to mention Marx and Lenin. No wonder you're supporting Kerry.

Sorry, Tenchusatsu, the above statement makes no sense. We have always had a progressive tax system where the rich pay a bigger share. Its just not as progressive as the French or German system, neither of which are socialistic countries. They are just more socialistic than we are.

The right is so used to using scare words like socialism that it no longer knows what't real and what's not.

ted