Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (24623)	1/16/2004 3:24:49 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793718

The man is a colossal phony. It's scary, because you can see Clark's brain working. "I have to decide how I am going to play this." Absolutely no "gravitas." Dean looked at it and decided, "I can pick up the nomination by going to angry anti-war." He may be right. The media obviously does not like him, and is blasting him in an attempt to stop him. The next two weeks will be very interesting, to say the least.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (24623)	1/16/2004 7:22:43 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793718

Andrew Sullivan has some very good comments on today's what-was-Clark's-position-on-Iraq-and-when fracas: I took some time yesterday to read carefully the Clark points in the context of that argument that he had flip flopped. I didn't take the time to research beyond that. Just from the quotes in that article, it seemed to me that he was being very subtle (since I can't say "nuanced" any more) in his positioning and word choice. He was very close to the line so you could read him either way. Since I wasn't sufficiently interested to do more research, I didn't bother to post my observations, which came down as "maybe, or maybe not."