Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (180664)	1/16/2004 8:10:14 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584253

Gee, I thought it was the Democrats and their income tax addiction Unlike the fight, spend and borrow of the republicans...some choices eh? Al

To: Joe NYC who wrote (180664)	1/16/2004 10:47:34 AM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1584253

Josef Re...I think the country should seriously look at a consumption tax, to correct these perverse incentives Democrats left us with. Agreed, that and most of the social engineer they are trying to do with taxes. I am not say all social engineering is bad, however it has become so rife with corruption, that all of it should be eliminated, and start over again. Wait, we can't do that, then the politicians wouldn't have any reason to persuade their targets to bribe them anymore.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (180664)	1/16/2004 12:05:32 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584253

Actually even millionaires did much better under Clinton. However yes if you want to be idle and conserve your huge family fortune, make sure Bush stays in power and makes working people pay for everything. The manta of the tax hawks saying "wealth is being punished" don't tell you the ral truth, that under Bush average working people are the ones punished. The only ones who win under Bush are already very rich, the ones who want to stay that way and don't want to share it.