SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : LNG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)6/22/2004 8:05:54 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
El Paso vets developing LNG ports
chron.com
June 22, 2004, 1:15AM
Copyright 2004 Houston Chronicle



WHEN El Paso Corp. decided last year to get out of the liquefied natural gas development business, Kathleen Eisbrenner feared the project she'd spent several years working on would be canceled. "I thought it was likely going to die ... it was likely just going to die a slow death," said Eisbrenner, who also lost her job as part of El Paso's restructuring.

It didn't turn out that way.

She, working with others, formed a company, Excelerate Energy, which, in turn, acquired the rights to the LNG system she helped create at El Paso. Eisbrenner is the president, while Excelerate's two vice presidents, Rob Bryngelson and Jonathan Cook, also came from El Paso and they helped to develop Energy Bridge.

The first Energy Bridge — a floating, offshore port that receives imports of liquefied natural gas — is on track to debut in the Gulf of Mexico 116 miles off Louisiana in January. The company, based in The Woodlands, hopes to build a series of Energy Bridge ports in the United States and elsewhere.

LNG, these days, is a hot trend in the oil and gas industry, as big and large companies rush to announce projects.

With demand for gas rising, fueled in part by a spate of new gas-fired electricity plants, the United States is expected to rely more on imports.

Gas from overseas is turned into a liquid for transport aboard tankers. Once it arrives, it's "regasified," so it can move into pipelines.

"For the foreseeable future, increased importation of LNG will be the only way to provide for the growth in demand for natural gas in North America," said George Kaiser, Excelerate's primary owner, and the president, chief executive and primary owner of the Kaiser-Francis Oil Co. in Oklahoma.

The United States has four LNG import terminals, with plans having been announced for many more, some onshore and some offshore. No one expects all to get built, especially as some face community opposition.

Not exactly a terminal

Excelerate could be the first new import facility built in the United States.

Its system is different from others, even those planned offshore. For one, it's not an actual terminal. With others, LNG tankers dock at a terminal, be it onshore or offshore, and liquid is turned back into gas at the facility.

Energy Bridge works this way: A buoy, which stays in the water 100 feet below the surface when not in use, locks into a special LNG tanker when it arrives. The buoy is anchored to the seabed by eight lines.

Liquid is turned into gas aboard the ship, then fed through the buoy into a flexible pipe, which connects to a subsea pipeline that brings the gas into shore.

Similar buoy and mooring technology was designed for the oil industry and has been in use for more than 10 years, including in the harsh conditions of the North Sea. Technology to regasifiy LNG on tankers had to be designed for Energy Bridge. Simulated tests showed it can withstand severe weather conditions, such as so-called 100-year storms, the company said.

Excelerate says Energy Bridge has advantages over conventional projects, including cost, quicker construction and less public opposition.

The Energy Bridge infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico will run about $60 million, including the buoy and mooring system, the flexible pipe, and eight miles of subsea pipeline to connect to two existing subsea pipeline systems. An actual terminal is more expensive.

Actual terminals can be constructed to receive, in general, more LNG than an Energy Bridge system. However, an Energy Bridge can be built to handle larger quantities of LNG for so-called "peak" periods.

Exmar of Belgium has been commissioned to build three Energy Bridge ships, which cost about $30 million more apiece than conventional LNG tankers, which go for $170 million. Exmar owns one, Kaiser's family foundation owns the second and the third is half-owned by Exmar and half-owned by Excelerate. Excelerate has long-term usage rights for all three.

Excelerate itself will buy LNG from overseas suppliers, then sell it in the United States.

The U.S. Maritime Administration, part of the Transportation Department, signed off on the Gulf of Mexico project in January. Government officials said then the port would avoid ''disruption to shoreline communities and the environment."

Excelerate expects the Environmental Protection Agency to grant the project air and water permits shortly. Construction is slated to start in the Gulf in August.

Flexibility important

At the moment, El Paso itself still has some involvement in the Gulf of Mexico project, but that could change over time. El Paso won't be involved in future Energy Bridge projects.

Energy Bridge represents interesting technology with tremendous potential and could give the industry a lot of flexibility, said Amy Myers Jaffe, an energy fellow at Rice University's Baker Institute.

Other large companies, she said, have worked on related technologies, though they haven't necessarily disclosed it.

"There is a huge first-mover advantage, so people don't talk about what they are doing in technology until they are ready to go," Jaffe said of the gas world.

Sara Banaszak, director of North American gas policy for consulting firm PFC Energy, characterized the Energy Bridge system as a sleeper option. People in the industry have already been watching the first project. But, she said: "I think they are going to be paying more attention as they realize how close the Gulf of Mexico project is to coming on-line."

Stakes are high

If it works well, others may decide to pursue deals with Excelerate for similar projects, said Banaszak, who isn't involved with Excelerate.

The stakes likely are high for Kaiser, who was No. 159 on Forbes 2004 World's Richest People List, worth $3 billion.

About $700 million in cash and credit, Kaiser said, has been committed for the benefit of Excelerate.

Kaiser is confident in the Excelerate team. Eisbrenner, 44, had been at El Paso since 1996, previously working as an engineer for an independent gas marketing company.

Cook, 42, came to El Paso when it merged with Coastal Corp. He had been managing the commercial activities of Coastal's marine department. And Bryngelson, 36, joined El Paso in 2000 from Enron, where he was involved in power and gas marketing.

The three comprise Excelerate, along with assistant Linda Mosley, who also was at El Paso. Other support is provided by the Kaiser-Francis organization.

Excelerate is working on another Energy Bridge, which would be in Massachusetts Bay and sit 10 miles from shore.

The company has met with Gov. Mitt Romney and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino.

One of the four existing terminals is in Everett, Mass. To get there, LNG tankers travel into Boston Harbor, which Menino has opposed. The Energy Bridge tankers wouldn't have to.

Menino thought Excelerate had interesting ideas, said Seth Gitell, the mayor's press secretary, adding that the mayor looks forward to talking again with Excelerate.

laura.goldberg@chron.com



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)6/30/2004 7:35:33 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
Twin Bros Marine to Build Metering Platform for LNG Terminal
rigzone.com
Twin Brothers Marine Tuesday, June 29, 2004

Twin Brothers Marine, LLC, Port of West St. Mary, near Lafayette, LA, is fabricating the metering platform, including the deck, jacket, pilings, and metering skids, that is a component of the Woodlands, Texas's Excelerate Energy, LLC's Energy Bridge - the world's first offshore LNG import terminal - that will be installed 116 miles offshore Louisiana in 280 feet of water at West Cameron Block 603.

Excelerate Energy's unique "Energy Bridge" concept, which has substantial cost, construction time, and environmental advantages over conventional facilities, was developed by its President Kathleen Eisbrenner and Vice Presidents Rob Bryngelson and Jonathan Cook while employed at El Paso Corp. Excelerate's primary owner is George Kaiser who is also the primary owner of Oklahoma's Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)7/7/2004 6:39:31 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 919
 
Excelerate Energy may be operating in January.
Nice article in Engineering News Record.
enr.com



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)7/18/2004 10:36:32 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
ABS To Class First Offshore LNG Deepwater Port Buoy
eagle.org
clicking on the low res image link will give you an idea of the scale of the thing.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)7/23/2004 9:38:50 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
Oil billionaire takes a gamble to fix natural-gas shortage
mlive.com
By RUSSELL GOLD
The Associated Press
7/23/04 8:27 AM

The Wall Street Journal

TULSA, Okla. -- In 2002, Kathleen Eisbrenner, then an executive at El Paso Corp., spent months trying in vain to find a buyer for the company's novel technology for importing natural gas.

In February 2003, she left for a vacation in Cancun, convinced that El Paso would be forced to abandon the project. As she sat on the beach one afternoon, she got a call on her cellphone. A colleague had a message from an intermediary, who said he had an "interested buyer," identified only as a "Midwest billionaire."

"It's Warren Buffett calling," she recalls telling her husband as they clinked pina colada glasses together in celebration. "I was absolutely sure."

But it wasn't Mr. Buffett. It was another billionaire named George B. Kaiser.

A relative unknown even in his home state of Oklahoma, Mr. Kaiser is a publicity-shy businessman with a fortune built on oil and banks. Like Mr. Buffett, who has been acquiring natural-gas pipelines, Mr. Kaiser is making a huge bet that demand for natural gas will continue to surge because it's a clean-burning fuel for power generation.

Right now, most of North America's natural-gas supply comes from North American wells. The gas goes from the wells through a network of underground pipelines to final users, without ever changing its gaseous form. That's the most efficient way -- but America is running out of its local supply.

Imports are an obvious answer. But to travel over the seas, the gas first has to be changed into a super-cooled liquid, loaded onto tankers and then changed back into gaseous form.

Currently, tankers unload their cargoes at one of four onshore terminals in the U.S., where the liquid is heated up. The capacity is limited, and with demand for natural-gas imports rising, more terminals are needed. But they face opposition by many communities worried that the fuel-filled structures or tankers could explode or be targeted by terrorists.

Mr. Kaiser's new way of handling imports is called Energy Bridge. He's invested $660 million in the project since he took it over from El Paso in December 2003. Energy Bridge is scheduled to go into operation next January in the Gulf of Mexico, about 100 miles off the Louisiana shoreline.

The technology works like this: Special tankers carrying liquefied natural gas from places like Egypt and Trinidad would idle in the gulf. The liquid would be heated while still on the tankers, returned to gaseous form and sent via an underwater pipeline into the U.S. pipeline network.

The Energy Bridge, with its tankers far beyond the horizon, eliminates the risk of explosions on land and thus sidesteps not-in-my-backyard controversies. If everything works as planned, backers say, the gulf project could increase the U.S.'s import capacity by up to 20 percent.

When El Paso put Energy Bridge up for sale, several of the world's biggest oil companies took a look but decided against buying it, partly because of its untested technology. Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, has never been turned into a gaseous form aboard a floating ship, and there were concerns about the impact of the rocking motion. While the process worked in a simulator built by El Paso in Alabama to mimic the motion of 12-foot swells, the technology still hasn't been tested under real-life conditions.

Some people are also skeptical Mr. Kaiser will be able to buy enough liquefied natural gas, in part because most of the supply is already under contract. "You can't just sail up and say fill 'er up," says Ira Joseph, managing director for global LNG at PIRA Energy. "The LNG business doesn't work that way."

But if Energy Bridge succeeds, Mr. Kaiser, who is 61 years old, could become one of the top 10 providers of natural gas in the U.S., just behind ConocoPhillips.

Kaiser-Francis Oil Co. was created in the 1940s by Mr. Kaiser's uncle and parents, Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany who settled in Oklahoma. Mr. Kaiser graduated from Harvard and took over the family company in 1969. At the time, it had fewer than 10 employees and operations in a single state, Kansas. He expanded the business and his fortune dramatically, in part by buying up properties during the oil industry's inevitable busts. Today, Kaiser-Francis fills a five-story headquarters building in Tulsa, and is producing oil and natural gas in at least eight states. Production is up about 100-fold from 1969.

Last year, the privately held company generated more than $600 million in revenues from oil and natural gas production, according to estimates by IHS Energy, a Houston energy consulting firm. That puts it in the same league as Tom Brown Inc., an energy company bought in April by EnCana Corp., based in Calgary, Alberta, for $2.3 billion.

Forbes magazine estimates Mr. Kaiser's wealth at $3 billion, placing him at No. 56 on its list of richest Americans. Much of his fortune came from high-risk bets in the banking and venture-capital areas, as well as the energy business. When bad loans to the oil industry left the Oklahoma energy and banking industries in tatters in the 1980s, he snapped up the Bank of Oklahoma from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. for $95 million.

Mr. Kaiser now owns a 70 percent stake, valued at $1.9 billion, in BOK Financial Corp., a publicly traded company that owns banks in Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Arkansas and New Mexico. Mr. Kaiser is so intense about his work that he once outfitted the back of a delivery van with a makeshift desk so that he could spread out his papers and work during the two-hour trips between Tulsa and Oklahoma City to visit banking clients.

With his wealth, Mr. Kaiser has endowed two foundations that have combined assets of more than $800 million. The foundations have given generously to nonprofit groups such as Oklahoma chapters of pro-choice groups and legal services for the poor. A major benefactor to the Jewish community in Oklahoma, which numbers about 5,000 people, Mr. Kaiser has told associates he plans to leave the bulk of his estate to charity. For every $1,000 he has given to Republican politicians, he has given $10,000 to Democrats, according to campaign contribution records.

Mr. Kaiser invested in Energy Bridge after years of research into energy markets. In the early 1990s, he built a detailed database of North American natural-gas production, comparing drilling rig and production trends with projected use. His conclusion: An "insoluble, long term shortfall" in natural gas was inevitable because demand would soon outstrip supply. He made a series of iconoclastic and hugely profitable bets in futures markets that natural-gas prices would rise. He also became increasingly interested in the emerging market for liquefied natural gas from overseas.

"He eats data for breakfast, lunch and dinner," says David S. Fleischaker, the Oklahoma energy secretary and a longtime acquaintance.

Mr. Kaiser began predicting a long-term shortage of natural gas at a time when abundant supplies had kept prices relatively low for many years. Now, however, domestic production is declining, and most industry experts agree that there isn't enough available natural gas in North America to match growing demand. In the last three years, natural-gas prices have doubled. Imports of liquefied natural gas could help ease the pinch, but the global LNG trade is still in its infancy.

At El Paso, a Houston energy company, Ms. Eisbrenner led a small team that developed Energy Bridge as an answer to the capacity bottleneck. Under the plan, a new type of tanker would pick up liquefied gas overseas, travel to the Gulf of Mexico and use an onboard facility to convert the liquid back to gaseous form. Then the gas would be sent through an undersea pipeline onto the North American continent. It would take up to six days to disgorge the cargo. Then the tankers would disconnect and go back to get more liquefied gas.

In the summer of 2002, El Paso believed LNG would be a primary vehicle for its future revenue growth. A disastrous move into energy trading, however, left the company saddled with a $25 billion debt load and forced to sell assets to stay afloat. To reduce its debt, El Paso had to sell the Energy Bridge project.

El Paso set up a data room in Houston where potential buyers could examine the project's financial and technical details. Most of the major energy companies, including the Royal Dutch/Shell Group and BP PLC, visited the data room but didn't make offers.

In early February 2003, El Paso said it would exit the LNG business. Dispirited, Ms. Eisbrenner, who had shepherded the project, decided to take a vacation. Mr. Kaiser, meantime, had read that the Energy Bridge technology was up for sale and decided to make a move. After Mr. Kaiser's representative contacted her, Ms. Eisbrenner flew to Tulsa for the first of two meetings with Mr. Kaiser.

Around the same time, Ms. Eisbrenner called Nicolas Saverys, the chief executive of Belgium-based Exmar NV. Exmar was building two of the new-style LNG vessels. Ms. Eisbrenner gushed that there was a wealthy buyer. Mr. Saverys was initially skeptical. He changed his mind in late February 2003 after meeting Mr. Kaiser in New York. "At last, I was talking to someone who was putting his own money at stake," he says.

Mr. Saverys sealed the relationship by presenting Mr. Kaiser with a box of pralines from Belgian chocolatier Pierre Marcolini at their second meeting. Mr. Kaiser, an avowed chocoholic, returned the favor a couple of weeks later in Tulsa, giving Mr. Saverys a box of candy made by Christine Joseph, a Tulsa chocolatier who also was born in Belgium.

Convinced that Energy Bridge could work, Mr. Kaiser agreed to take over the business, closing the deal last December. El Paso paid him $75 million; in return, he assumed a $120 million obligation to Exmar. El Paso also agreed to pay to install the underwater pipeline connection that carries the gas from the ship to existing pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico.

The bulk of the $660 million Mr. Kaiser invested went to modify three specially equipped tankers and to charter them for 20 years. If Energy Bridge opens on time in January, it will be at least two and a half years ahead of any new terminals being developed by other energy companies. In addition, civic leaders in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, eager to keep LNG terminals and tankers far from the mainland, are encouraging Mr. Kaiser to build an offshore tanker-based project along the Atlantic coast of the U.S.

Mr. Kaiser, who declined requests for an interview but answered some questions by e-mail, concedes he doesn't like "taking a risk on an undemonstrated technology." But he says that the chance to import natural gas quickly was "such an obvious and alluring business opportunity" that he felt compelled to get Energy Bridge into operation. He's betting that new LNG-export facilities expected to come online next year in Egypt, Trinidad and Nigeria will create enough extra supply to provide him with ample LNG.

Some companies are looking to develop offshore platforms to accept and process LNG. Those platforms would have a bigger capacity than Energy Bridge, but would cost much more and take longer to build.

ChevronTexaco Corp., for example, plans to build an offshore platform terminal to handle LNG, but it has yet to begin the multiyear construction project. Exxon Mobil has flirted with onshore terminals but now isn't ruling out the offshore route.

Assuming Mr. Kaiser gets both the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic projects open, he would be supplying about 1 percent of the natural gas consumed by the U.S. He also hired Ms. Eisbrenner to run the Energy Bridge projects.

As Energy Bridge nears its planned starting date in January, Mr. Kaiser is turning his attention back to his philanthropy projects. He's creating an early-childhood education center in Tulsa that's designed to provide high-quality childcare to low-income children. It's expected to open in 2006.

He says he acquired Energy Bridge as a challenge. "I don't gain much pleasure from personal expenditure or recognition," he wrote in an e-mail. "And any gains I make from the enterprise will accrue to charity. But I enjoy problem solving and I want to keep my brain active to forestall (or at least diminish) atrophy."



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)7/25/2004 12:24:45 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 919
 
LNG proposal draws heat from fishermen
Company plans offshore station
boston.com
Not that the offshore Excelerate Energy station would kill the lobsters, but that the facility would create a small patch of ocean where the commercial fishermen could not go in and kill the lobsters.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)7/28/2004 7:42:23 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 919
 
Excelerate Energy's Newsletter
"Energy Bridge Express"
excelerateenergy.com
FWIW



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)12/12/2004 3:29:30 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 919
 
Company holds off on LNG plans
ecnnews.com
Saturday, December 11, 2004

By Lisa Arsenault
Staff writer

The Texas company planning a liquefied natural gas unloading facility 10 miles off the Gloucester coast doesn't expect to file its application for the project until late May, roughly six months behind the original plan.

Excelerate Energy LLC released preliminary plans for a $200 million LNG line off Gloucester in June. The proposal drew immediate criticism from city officials and local fishermen who are afraid the docking facility will disturb fish habitats and force more fishing ground closures.

Excelerate had planned to file its application for the project with federal and state regulators by December but has decided more time is needed to get input from the public first, Excelerate Vice President Rob Bryngelson said.

The delay will give city officials and fishing industry advocates more time to organize opposition to the controversial project, Mayor John Bell said.

"Because the approval process is sort of a short fuse, I suspect they are not going to file until they know they can win," Bell said. "There's not an ounce of paper that has been filed but there is a swirl of activity around LNG and Gloucester."

Research vessels hired by Excelerate have been in Gloucester mapping the ocean floor over the past few weeks.

The preliminary plans call for specially constructed natural gas tankers that would dock at two floating buoys 10 miles off the Gloucester coast. Once the tankers are safely moored, they would begin a process that converts natural gas from its liquid state to a gas — all onboard the ship. The gas would then be delivered through the buoy.

The gas would travel down to a 24-inch wide, 8-mile long pipeline buried about 3 feet under the ocean floor. It would connect to the existing underwater, offshore Hubline gas pipeline and eventually to land. The buoys are strong enough to withstand a hurricane and would allow boats to pass over the dock when a tanker is not making a delivery, according to Kathleen Eisbrenner, the president of Excelerate Energy LLC.

Eisbrenner said the floating buoys do not touch the ocean floor, where it could disturb fish habitats.

But local fishermen say laying close to 12 miles of pipe to connect the facility to an existing natural gas pipeline between Danvers and Weymouth would be harmful to fish and close key fishing grounds.

At a meeting yesterday at the National Marine Fisheries Service lab on Emerson Avenue, fishermen said they are afraid of the risk of fishing with nets that drag along the bottom with a natural gas pipeline buried only 3 feet deep. They also asked how much water around the tankers will be closed off for security when the tankers are moving to and from the buoys.

The LNG tankers are 970-foot ships that require a 500-meter security border at all times, Bryngelson said. The ships will anchor at the buoys one at a time. Once a tanker connects, it is at the buoy for a week and then another one comes in.

Bryngelson said the company chose that area of the water because the depth was just right for the facility and it is outside of designated shipping lanes. He also explained that a shortage of gas and a desire to build the facilities offshore due to security threats on land since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Bell and other city officials are trying to get Gov. Mitt Romney to come out against the proposed Gloucester LNG facility.

"Because the approval process is sort of a short fuse, I suspect they are not going to file until they know they can win," Bell said.

Bell is drafting a letter to the governor opposing the project that he hopes will be signed by the City Council, as well as the mayors of Salem and Beverly. Bell said he hopes to meet with the governor and the lieutenant governor sometime in January.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24)3/4/2005 9:02:57 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 919
 
Energy Bridge Terminal Prepares for First 3 Bcf LNG Delivery This Month
intelligencepress.com

Excelerate Energy's Gulf Gateways Energy Bridge is scheduled on March 20 to become the world's first operational deepwater liquefied natural gas (LNG) port. The port, which is located 116 miles off the south coast of Louisiana in 298 feet of water, will deliver about 3 Bcf of regasified LNG into the pipeline grid via the Sea Robin and Blue Water subsea systems at a rate of about 500 MMcf/d.

"Some of these pipelines have not seen this much gas, they told us, for 15 years," said Excelerate Energy CEO Kathleen Eisbrenner in an interview with NGI. "They are pretty happy. They've been running at a 30% load factor and here comes a 500 MMcf/d well!"

Excelerate estimates its first LNG vessel will arrive at its specialized buoy on March 17. There will be a couple of days of equipment commissioning and then it will begin regasification March 20.

The company has been working with the pipelines to prepare contractually and physically for the large amount of new gas that will enter the pipeline grid. "The metering platform and associated pipes are gassed up and ready to go, all the valving is in place and the pipelines have been pigged," said Eisbrenner.

Another 3 Bcf cargo is expected to arrive next month and by the end of the year Excelerate could be receiving three cargoes/month, or about 9 Bcf/month, she said. "We are working on cargoes through the end of the year but we're not really focused on beyond that at this point. We'll start with one cargo a month and probably end the year with two to three. We can ramp up to 4-5 cargoes a month next year. That would bring the capacity to 500-600 MMcf/d.

"We have one ship commissioned now. We'll have another in April and then a third in October of 2006," she said. "We also are looking at some other ways to increase our capacity utilization despite the finite number of Energy Bridge vessels."

Excelerate's model is unique in the LNG business. The company has commissioned the construction of specialized 138,000 cubic meter LNG vessels with onboard regasification and specialized equipment that facilitate deliveries directly into a special buoy that is connected to existing offshore subsea pipelines.

One major fault in the business model is that conventional LNG vessels cannot deliver into Excelerate's deepwater port. In the LNG business, which is built around 20-year contracts with only occasional bids for excess cargoes, that's a major problem.

However, Eisbrenner said Excelerate already is planning a way around that. "We've designed a couple other technologies that could be built very quickly that might facilitate the transshipment of LNG and/or the use of our existing port for a regasification facility that will allow conventional vessels to dock," she said.

"We have a physically permitted port in the Gulf of Mexico. We could use the port for a barge that would have onboard regas equipment which would then allow conventional vessels to come and off-load through that. We would have to have it built. But we are more than just looking at that right now." Eisbrenner would not say when Excelerate would be prepared to handle conventional vessels.

For now the privately-owned company is content to move forward with what will be the first new LNG terminal in North America. The Energy Bridge facility was the second application for a deepwater port received by the Maritime Administration on Jan. 23, 2003. The administration now has applications for 10 terminals and FERC has applications for about 20 others, three of which already have permits. Gulf Gateways Energy Bridge received a favorable record of decision on Dec. 31, 2003 and a license to construct, operate, and decommission the facility on May 26, 2004.