SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (24694)1/16/2004 4:02:06 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793715
 
Excellent article LB. You & Nadine find some of the most
well reasoned FA analyses & practical historical
retrospectives around.

Thanks.



To: LindyBill who wrote (24694)1/16/2004 4:16:46 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793715
 
Muslim Groups' IRS Files Sought

Homeland Security

By By Dan Eggen and John Mintz

Washington Post
January 14, 2004
Web site: washingtonpost.com

The Senate Finance Committee has asked the Internal Revenue Service to turn over confidential tax and financial records, including donor lists, on dozens of Muslim charities and foundations as part of a widening congressional investigation into alleged ties between tax-exempt organizations and terrorist groups, according to documents and officials.

The request marks a rare and unusually broad use of the Finance Committee's power to obtain private financial records held by the government. It raises the possibility that contributions to charities such as the Holy Land Foundation or the activities of such groups as the Muslim Student Association could be subjected to Senate scrutiny.

An IRS official said the agency expects to comply with the request because the committee clearly has the statutory authority to examine such records. The request includes leadership lists, financial records, applications for tax-exempt status, audit materials and the results of criminal investigations.

The Senate-led probe follows more than two years of investigations by the FBI, the Treasury Department and other federal agencies into the activities of Islamic charities suspected of having ties to al Qaeda; the Islamic Resistance Movement, also known as Hamas; and other groups designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government. The United States has frozen more than $136 million in assets allegedly linked to al Qaeda or other terrorist groups and has effectively shut down the operations of the largest U.S.-based Islamic charities.

"Government officials, investigations by federal agencies and the Congress and other reports have identified the crucial role that charities and foundations play in terror financing," the committee's leaders, Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and ranking Democratic member Max Baucus (Mont.), wrote in a Dec. 22 letter to the IRS. "We have a responsibility to carry out oversight to ensure charities, foundations and other groups are abiding by the laws and regulations, to examine their source of funds, and to ensure government agencies, including the IRS, are policing them and enforcing the law efficiently and effectively."

But many Muslim leaders and attorneys for the charities complain that the government's tactics have unfairly smeared law-abiding Muslims and have dried up financial support for groups that try to provide medicine, food and other goods to the Middle East and elsewhere. Several representatives of the groups said the Senate Finance Committee's probe is needlessly intrusive and will scare away more contributors.

"The Muslim community would view this as another fishing expedition solely targeting Muslims in America," said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in Washington. "Are they now going to start a witch hunt of all the donors of these now closed relief organizations, so that Muslims feel they're going to be targeted once more based on their charitable giving?"

Roger C. Simmons, a Frederick, Md., lawyer who represents the Illinois-based Global Relief Foundation, whose assets have been frozen by the government, said: "This kind of blanket request would further chill the tendency for American Muslims to give money. As far as the organizations themselves, I'm not sure what else they can do to them that they haven't already done."

Committee staffers said the investigation is based not on ethnicity or religious affiliation but rather on concerns that the groups may have ties to terrorists or their supporters. "This is not a fishing expedition targeting Muslims," one Senate aide said. "All the groups we're looking at are suspected of having some connections to terrorism or of doing propaganda for terrorists. We're not presuming anybody's guilty."

The Senate Finance Committee is one of a handful of congressional panels that have the authority to request information from the IRS that is covered by privacy protections under Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code. Although such information has been requested in the past, including as part of the probe into the Enron Corp. scandal, committee staffers and outside experts said the scope of this request is unusual because of its breadth and because it is part of a wide-ranging terrorism-related investigation.

Donald Alexander, a former IRS commissioner, said the request "is rather broad," but he added that he expects the committee will be judicious in releasing any private information to the public.

"The Finance Committee has indicated its concerns in the past as to whether the IRS has been properly policing charities, and this is a reflection of that," Alexander said. "They've done a good job in the past of protecting the information and using it wisely."

The letter addressed to IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson includes a request for 990 forms, which are public documents that list a group's leaders and large donors, and 1023 forms, which organizations use to apply for tax exemptions as nonprofit groups. Grassley and Baucus, who asked that the material be turned over by Feb. 20, also requested "any and all materials from examinations, audits and other investigations, including criminal investigations."

The foundations and charities named by the committee in its request include many that remain targets of ongoing investigations by U.S. authorities. Among them are the SAAR Foundation and its affiliated entities, a defunct network of organizations based in Northern Virginia; Global Relief, whose founder was deported to Lebanon; and the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the largest Muslim charity in the United States, which was singled out by President Bush for allegedly supporting Hamas. Its assets have been frozen.

Other groups on the list include the Muslim World League, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth and the Islamic Society of North America.

The latest probe stems from recent Finance Committee hearings on fundraising and financing by radical Islamic groups and will be focused on whether the organizations on the list deserve their tax-exempt status, committee staffers said.

"We want to look into where all their money comes from," one committee aide said. "Is it from foreign embassies? Does money come from obscure individuals in the Persian Gulf? We're the only ones that can look at this."

defenddemocracy.org



To: LindyBill who wrote (24694)1/16/2004 4:23:09 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 793715
 
More from The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies site.....

Business Must Be Involved in Security Planning

By Ralph Shrader, James Woolsey
Financial Times (London)
January 16, 2004

Once, the military alone could protect us from the threats that mattered. Now businesses also have a crucial role to play in national security. They own the vast majority of the west's critical infrastructure: telephone lines, gas pipelines, transport and so on. Office towers and tourist spots, airliners and container ships are the "soft targets" preferred by international terrorists. Both the private and public sectors now share previously unimagined security challenges, which must be met by new forms of partnership.

Nowhere is this new reality more evident than in the threats stalking European airlines on trans-Atlantic routes to and from the US. Lives and livelihoods ultimately rest on the ability of the private and public sector to work together and respond quickly to such dangers. The need for collaboration is particularly important when it comes to sharing information.

Businesses know more than government about the vulnerability of their infrastructure to general threats, but there is no obvious way to pass that information to the public sector and even then there is no assurance that it will not be misused. For the private sector to direct finite security resources effectively, information on specific threats is critical. Yet classified intelligence cannot be shared routinely with private companies. Government and business must be able to exchange timely information during an emergency. A crisis is no time to start distributing business cards.

The Business Roundtable, an association of chief executive officers of 150 of the largest US companies, has created a secure public-private communications system that allows federal officials to exchange information with chief executive officers during a crisis. Its value was demonstrated during a recent war-game exercise, sponsored in part and conducted by Booz Allen Hamilton. Several dozen senior govern ment officials and business leaders from various industries took part in a two-day simulation to test how information was shared. The war game modelled a bio-terror attack on a major US city and a simultaneous cyber-attack on two large financial institutions.

The good news is that timely communication during the simulation reduced casualties and helped the US economy endure the attack. The Department of Homeland Security and company executives rapidly established priorities, negotiated roles and responsibilities, and took action to alleviate the crisis and avert chaos.

War games are designed to probe a system's weak points and the scenario revealed that the procedures for industry and government to make decisions were inadequate. Decisions that were expected only to have a local impact turned out to reverberate across industries and public agencies. Slow action by the financial services industry and regulators delayed decision-making throughout business and government.

To allow information to be shared during an emergency, government and businesses must build collaboration into their normal operations, so that resources can be mobilised and leaders can act decisively when the need arises. A system must be developed that will balance urgent needs against the accuracy of available information.

One way to improve the sharing of information would be to include industry formally in many of the public sector's activities. In particular, governments should seek the private sector's views as they develop response and recovery plans. Collaboration would take advantage of industry's resources and expertise, and keep businesses up to date about what would be expected of them in a crisis.

Clear accountability and leadership is critical for such collaboration. In the private sector, corporate boards must require managers to be more resilient, and to review periodically emergency plans and their implementation. In the public sector in the US, Homeland Security, the lead agency for determining and co-ordinating security operations, must take the lead in organising public-private partnerships. This sort of integrated planning and response has not been necessary in the past. Now it is crucial. The war on terror will be more like the cold war than the second world war. It will be long, and will require new models for organising business and government - not just short-term ways of weathering the storm.

Ralph Shrader is chairman and chief executive of Booz Allen Hamilton and R. James Woolsey is a vice-president of the consultancy and former director of Central Intelligence

defenddemocracy.org



To: LindyBill who wrote (24694)1/16/2004 4:40:24 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 793715
 
Bush to Seek More Cash for Terror Finance Trackers
FOXNews
Friday, January 16, 2004

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration wants to make more money available for two agencies central to the government's efforts to paralyze terrorists financially and to combat money laundering.

The president's budget for 2005 will seek from Congress increases of almost 13 percent for the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (search), known as FinCen, and of around 4 percent for the Office of Foreign Assets Control (search), called OFAC, the department said Friday.

"President Bush has reaffirmed the administration's commitment to aggressively fight terrorism on every front," Treasury Secretary John Snow said of the funding request.

FinCen analyzes and shares a network of financial information with law enforcement and intelligence agencies to help to investigate and track down terrorist financiers and money launderers (search). OFAC is responsible for ordering U.S. banks to block assets of suspected terrorist financiers and for enforcing economic sanctions against countries, such as Cuba, and against suspected drug overlords.

Bush is expected to send his budget to Congress on Feb. 2 for the 2005 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

It remains to be seen how generous the Republican-controlled Congress wants for the agencies' budgets.

There has been criticism by some lawmakers, including Republicans, about how OFAC does its job and how the Treasury Department handles the campaign against financiers of terror. Democrats complain about the administration's huge budget deficits, which the White House budget chief estimated will mushroom to $500 billion this year, a record in dollar terms.

FinCen's 2004 budget stands at $57.2 million, which the president wants to increase next year to $64.5 million, said FinCen's director, William Fox. The agency has 277 full-time employees, and the 2005 budget would seek to add 14 positions, to 291, Fox said.

Treasury officials had no details of how the roughly $7.3 million extra would be used. The department said, however, that some of the money would go toward making a secured, electronic system of financial records more widely available to law enforcement; designing a new system that would include advanced analytical tools; and hiring more people who analyze information and who deal with outreach and regulations matters.

For OFAC, the president's proposal would provide an extra $800,000 over its current budget of $21.7 million. Treasury didn't say how the extra money would be used.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee's ranking Democrat, sent a letter just before Christmas citing widespread misgivings about sloppy record keeping and lax enforcement inside OFAC.

A recent report by the General Accounting Office (search), the investigative arm of Congress, said Treasury needed to do a better job tracking the money that terrorists use to bankroll violence.

foxnews.com