SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (525229)1/16/2004 4:56:32 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The credibility of Social Security Welfare queens on the subject of economics is less-than-zero.

It's bad enough they are STEALING from an entire republic-but someone has taught them to JABBER while they do it.

Thus, their comeuppance will be THAT much more brutal...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (525229)1/16/2004 4:58:52 PM
From: DizzyG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
As I told you before, Kenneth...

When does the bleeding stop?

The bleeding stops when ALL politicians stop spending so much money. It's really that simple.

Diz-



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (525229)1/16/2004 6:22:04 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
There are folks that don't think that at all. THey think Clinto was the worst and the most dangerous.

********************

Senator Tom Harkin had a cook out. Steaks and chance to rub elbows with Clinton for $30 bucks. A lot of democrats came. Bill Clinton came. Bill loved it. But then, Bill always loves being the center of attention. Bill still thinks he IS President.

Senator Bob Graham, who is struggling to even be seen, realized that if he wanted any attention at all, he would have to kiss up to Bill Clinton. "Aren't we proud to have Bill Clinton as an American and a Democrat," said Graham. Of course, all the candidates were struggling just to breath as yet another Clinton sucked all the air of the state of Iowa. That got me to thinking about the wonderful years of Clinton/Gore. Those 8 years that so many keep saying we had "unprecedented peace and prosperity". Yes, those Brigadoon years of paradise when Bill was in charge were free of problems and woe. There were no homeless. There were no poor or unemployed. Everyone walked around with a big, silly smile on their faces from all the joy. I was tempted to check and see if anyone even died in those eight, carefree years.

Proud of Bill Clinton? Oh my, yes! I'm so proud of how he taught our children that oral sex isn't really sex at all! Isn't it wonderful how he showed them that adultery is an ok thing to do. It's very modern. Very "European". Don't forget he also taught them that to lie under oath, as long as you are President, isn't breaking the law, it's to be expected and accepted. He taught them that the hypocrisy of going to church Easter Sunday, clutching your bible in one hand and your wife in the other and then meeting your mistress in the afternoon is the new, acceptable American lifestyle. That was the blissful era when the cleaning people often refused to go into the White House bathrooms because they were tired of encountering Clinton staff either smoking or snorting dope or having sex on the floor. Freedom of expression I say. It was a time when staff ran from the FBI who wanted to do their mandatory FBI checks. Hey, they were busy people!

Forget that Clinton was impeached. Forget the dozens of people who fled the country so they wouldn't have to testify in the many Clinton scandals. After all, if you leave the country you can't lie under oath can you! They were just doing a good thing for America and were to bashful to come forward and tell us all about it. Their pride in all the money they gave Bill was just so great they felt that to take credit for it would embarrass the President. Forget all the convictions of Clinton friends and partners in business and high staff members. Pay no attention to the curious plane crashes and suicides. That was just part of the "vast right wing conspiracy".

Aren't we all just bursting with pride how Mr. Clinton handled terrorism? Aren't the families of the at least 687 people killed by terrorists attacks here and around the world, directed against Americans on our ships, in our embassies, in our Federal Buildings and on our airplanes just thrilled that they were able to sacrifice their loved ones to help Bill look "Presidential" in his troubled times? How about the over 6000 injured and maimed in those attacks? They should feel honored to have been a part of Clinton's non-war on terror.

Wasn't it a clever come back of Bill's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, to explain it all away by saying, off-handedly, "This is hard to say and I haven't found a way to say it that doesn't sound crass, but it is the truth that those {attacks before Sept. 11} were happening overseas and while there were Americans who died, there were not thousands and it did not happen on U. S. soil." I thank her for educating me in the fact that U.S. Embassies and American ships are no longer considered "American soil" and that as long as it's only a few hundred murdered Americans, we need not get upset about it. How wrong I was about that! Silly me, getting angry about all those unanswered attacks and dead and maimed Americans.

Didn't Bill save us all from those evil militias and white supremacists when he sent the order to the FBI to ignore all foreign terror threats? They had no time for that with all those domestic evil-doer's in our midst's. In fact, we had little to worry about because Bill was in control. He kept those bad guys from hurting anyone, yes indeed. Not one militia group did us any harm while HE was President. Thanks Bill!

And how about the corporate greed and corruption that was overlooked just so the economy would appear to be going great guns while Bill was President? No matter that that bubble had to burst. Brush aside the warnings that the Stock Market was headed for a fall. All the economists warned us. But they were ignored. Hey, things are going great! We are making tons of money! Who cares about what happens down the road. Those corporations were giving Bill and the DNC money, lots of it. For example, the Airline industry gave the DNC half a million dollars to persuade Al Gore that more airline safety laws really weren't necessary. All those reports about terrorists high-jacking planes and using them as missiles were just a lot of bunk. Al himself said in his book that terrorists were no threat to the U.S. Bill didn't care, he would be out of office when reality struck. He would be safe. That was all that was important. His false premise of prosperity and safety would be preserved. His legacy secure. No one would tell on him....would they?

An especially proud moment for me in those 8 years was when Clinton, Kerry, Torricelli and most of the democrats showed us that our spies should not be cavorting around with bad people! How disgusting! Thank you so much for showing our CIA the proper way to conduct themselves with your "high" moral and ethical standards Mr. Torricelli and I'm sure all those charges against you for corruption and graft where just trumped up by evil Republicans.

We can't over look the fact that Bill saved us all that money that was being spent on the military. You cut the military in half, Kerry helped you stop any pay raises and put the rest on food stamps. Good job! Then you sent them all over the world to be meals on wheels and to be under the command of some U.N. commander for the first time in history. Moral in our military hadn't been that low, well, since Carter! What an accomplishment! And all in just 8 years! Amazing.

Ah, we can't let your outstanding record in the dealings with North Korea go unrecognized. You had an iron clad treaty with the North Korean's. The fact that they broke it right from the start isn't your fault. What were you to do? You knew they were not being good boys and girls. Dealing with the fact that an unstable Communist leader who imprisons and starves his own people by the millions, threatens his neighbors constantly and says he will nuke the U.S. if he gets the chance, breaks the treaty and now has those nuclear weapons is just so.....difficult. Confrontation is so time consuming and gives you worry wrinkles. You had important things to do! Like defending your behavior and gathering in all that money for your re-elections and stuff. When you think about it, it really is the Republicans fault. If they hadn't gotten so upset by the lies, cheating, illegal campaign money, selling of the Presidency and state secrets to the highest bidder, NONE of this would have happened! Shame on them.

Another proud moment in your Presidency is when Warren Christopher resigned because he felt you were selling out America's security for money. He was a foolish old man who felt that turning over our high-tech industry to China just might be a tad unsafe down the road. The American missile guidance programming source codes embedded in commercial U.S. satellites in the hands of the Chinese, Christopher thought, could jeopardize "...significant military and intelligence interests...of the United States missile guidance system." Not to worry, the Chinese will never bomb the U.S. Will they? Being the good and loyal friend that you are, you issued a post dated Executive Order protecting the two companies under Congressional investigation for selling our secrets to the Chinese. What a guy. That's right up there with all those pardons to tax evaders and terrorists. They had suffered enough, don't you think? 179 in the last day alone. What a compassionate guy.

Of course, these are just the highlights of your accomplishments we Americans should be proud of that took place during your Administration. You were so creative! Who would have thought to sell nights in the Lincoln Bedroom, rides on Air Force One, even plots in our Arlington National Cemetery! I mean, who else would have thought of those inventive ways to line their pockets with campaign money.

"I never had a nickel until I left the White House." That's what you said this weekend in Iowa. Poor guy. Of course you have never had to own your home because you were always living off the taxpayers in Government housing like the Arkansas Governors mansion and the White House with servants and maids and chefs. I know this was tough, but we are so glad you made that sacrifice for us. To make up for this sacrifice we taxpayers now pay your exorbitant house payment with joy in our hearts. Does Hillary still write off those used underwear she donates to Goodwill?

It's just so hard for us average, peanut-brained Americans to totally get a grip on the job you did while in office. So don't you let us forget! Lord knows, you won' t ever let us forget you were President. You remind us every, single day what a "great" President you think you were. Some actually believe it! So you keep having your people remind us of all the really good things you did for us. Maybe someday, someone will actually find something!

bushcountry.org



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (525229)1/16/2004 6:29:02 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769667
 
Clinton, the revisionist

This month, Bill Clinton has been bouncing from one camera to the next, from one media forum to another — revising history along the way, and preaching what his administration never practiced. We separate fact from Mr. Clinton's fiction.
• On Iraq, with NBC's Katie Couric: "If we have to go without another U.N. resolution — if we have to go and European powers or Russia or China are vocally opposed to this — then there will always be the suggestion that this was, in effect, a pre-emptive strike. ... We've never done that. And Democratic powers normally wait to get hit before they hit."
The facts: On Dec. 16, 1998, without U.N. approval — indeed, in the face of pronounced objections from U.N. Security Council members France, Russia and China — the United States joined Britain in a four-day strike against Iraq. At the time, Mr. Clinton justified the attack because a report by U.N. weapons inspectors determined that Iraq had failed to "provide the full cooperation it promised."
Nor did Mr. Clinton seek U.N. approval before the United States and its NATO partners began bombing to protect Bosnian Muslims in 1995.
Four years later, Mr. Clinton again ignored the United Nations when he persuaded NATO to embark on a sustained bombing campaign of Yugoslavia to protect Muslims in Kosovo.
• On North Korea, with CNN's Larry King, Mr. Clinton says his administration succeeded in ending North Korea's nuclear-weapons program using plutonium. "It turns out they had this smaller laboratory program to develop a nuclear bomb with enriched uranium," he later told Mr. King, as if he had only learned about the uranium gambit when North Korea admitted it last fall.
The facts: 1998 newspaper accounts, citing Clinton administration intelligence sources, reported fears that the North Koreans were "pursuing nuclear-weapons activities" in a "huge underground construction complex." Moreover, the Clinton administration officially acknowledged these concerns in its fiscal 2001 budget, noting that energy assistance to North Korea would be forthcoming only if North Korea (1) "is not seeking to develop or acquire the capability to enrich uranium" and (2) "is complying with its obligations under the agreement regarding access to suspect underground construction."
• On counterterrorism, Mrs. Couric asked Mr. Clinton if he ever kicked himself "for not doing more about al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden." Mr. Clinton incomprehensibly replied, "I don't know what else I could have done. I — I did everything I thought I could."
The facts: In 2001, eight years after Islamic terrorists first tried to take down the World Trade Center, the Rudman-Hart report concluded: "America faces extraordinary new dangers for which we are not prepared."
Promoting self-serving revisionism, Mr. Clinton's media blitz has offered no worthwhile insights on the great issues of the day.
mfa.gov.yu



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (525229)1/16/2004 6:33:14 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The Real Scandal Is Global Crossing - Not Enron
March 10, 2002
by Tom Barrett, Editor@ConservativeTruth.org

Why has the press ignored one of the largest bankruptcies in history, one which eclipsed the Enron debacle in many ways? Could it be because the head of the Democratic National Committee made $18 million from the Global Crossing scandal, selling all his stock just before the company collapsed?

While Enron has become a household name, Global Crossing is unknown to most Americans. Hardly a news report is aired without a mention of Enron. Seven Congressional committees are investigating that failed company. Yet Global Crossing is hardly mentioned by the media elite, and Congress seems to have no interest in investigating the causes of this much more significant bankruptcy. I wonder why?

Mention the following facts to almost any American, and see what reaction you get. My guess is a blank stare. Most Americans only talk about (and think about) what the liberal media tells them is important. Global Crossing’s bankruptcy was the fourth largest in America’s history. Far more employees’ lives were ruined by the collapse of Global Crossing than were employed by Enron. No one (except the employees and retirees whose finances were devastated) seems to care. Why?

Terry McAuliffe, Bill Clinton’s hand-picked Chairman of the Democratic National Committee, invested $100,000 in Global Crossing stock. He sold it less than two years later, just before the company’s collapse for $18 million - an 18,000% profit! Surely this was an innocent coincidence. But it does remind one of Hillary Clinton’s remarkable performance in the cattle futures market, a very risky area of investing in which even seasoned professionals lose millions. McAuliffe may face criminal insider trading charges stemming from the astonishing profits he made. Yet "investigative journalists" are staying away from this story in droves. Why?

Global Crossing gave far more money to the Democratic Party than Enron gave to both political parties combined. The failure of Global Crossing’s federally insured Savings and Loan (which also contributed heavily to the Democrats) will cost U.S. taxpayers billions. NewsMax.com reports that Enron "had a cozy relationship with McAuliffe, ex-President Bill Clinton and other Democrats." Yet neither the press nor Congress are interested in Global Crossing. Why?

The media bosses are frantically sending reporters all over the world to investigate the slightest hint about any campaign donations George Bush might have received from Enron. They’ve made much of the fact that Enron officials appealed to the White House for help in their last days, while almost totally ignoring the fact that the Administration turned them down. But no one is asking McAuliffe and the Clintons how much Enron’s huge contributions influenced the decision of the Clinton Administration to underwrite the financing of a now defaulted loan granted to the government of India for a nuclear reactor power plant. Why?

Liberal TV and newspaper groups have tried desperately to tie top Republicans to the Enron scandal. Nothing of substance has emerged from the millions they have spent in this effort. Yet it is well-known that Terry McAuliffe did "political work" for Global Crossing founder Gary Winnick. After his receiving his windfall profits, McAuliffe set up a golf outing for Winnick and then-president Clinton. Winnick later donated $1 million to the Clinton Presidential Library, which is actually a Clinton slush fund to be used however he wishes. When we consider McAuliffe’s documented role in selling government favors for campaign contributions during the Clinton years, we have to wonder just what Global Crossing got for the $1 million they gave to Clinton. Perhaps the donation helped Clinton make his decision to give the company a $400 million Pentagon contract. No one is asking these questions. Why?

I think it is obvious why the media has all but ignored Global Crossing, while treating the American public to a blitz of coverage about Enron the likes of which have not seen since the O.J. Simpson trials. The mass media is incapable of objective reporting. They have become the Public Relations arm of the liberals, the Democrats, and the Socialist Party. Over 92% of the reporters, editors and producers in the mainstream media are registered to vote either Democrat or Socialist.

So we should not be surprised when these "unbiased" newspeople scream for blood at the slightest hint that the President or other Republicans might have been close to Enron officials. And we should not be surprised when they ignore a much bigger story, one with facts instead of innuendo, because "their" people are involved. Liberals shriek in outrage at any attempt by the corporations which own the news outlets to influence the news. Yet they are willing to roll over and play dead, like any good lap dog, when their liberal masters are in trouble.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (525229)1/16/2004 6:38:17 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769667
 
bmstahoe.com