SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Wesley Clark -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: portage who wrote (1207)1/18/2004 12:00:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Clark Steadily Gains Momentum in N.H.

___________________________

As Most Rivals Court Iowa, Candidate Points to Résumé

By David S. Broder
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 18, 2004
washingtonpost.com

EPPING, N.H., Jan. 17 -- Friday night, retired Army Gen. Wesley K. Clark enjoyed an experience he will not soon be able to repeat.



While most of his rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination were putting on their final push for votes in Monday's Iowa caucuses and Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) was observing the Jewish Sabbath, Clark had New Hampshire all to himself.

He made the most of it, drawing an overflow crowd of about 400 on a frosty night to the elementary school gym in this normally Republican town halfway between Manchester and the seacoast.

Saturday, Clark was all over the state, staging five events at which he was accompanied by fellow Arkansans, led by former senators Dale Bumpers and David Pryor. On Sunday, while Lieberman is in South Carolina and the others are still camped in Iowa, the former NATO commander will build his bonds with voters in the first primary state by joining a crowd in Sunapee watching television as the New England Patriots play the Indianapolis Colts for the American Football Conference championship.

But come Tuesday, when the quintet of candidates contesting Iowa arrives by plane, the landscape and airwaves will be crowded until the polls open Jan. 27.

By all measures -- including public polls and the judgments of rival managers -- Clark has benefited from his decision to skip Iowa and to camp out here.

Dante Scala, a professor at Saint Anselm College and author of a recent book on the New Hampshire primary, said on Saturday: "Clark has clearly made better use of the time than Lieberman," the only other candidate to bypass Iowa. "Lieberman has made a little movement, but Clark has made big strides; some would say he has caught fire. He has used his biography to the best advantage of all the candidates, and his low-key, self-deprecating manner has established a connection with the voters."

Scala and others note that Clark's personal appeal -- backed by the heaviest television advertising buy of any campaign in the past three weeks -- may have outrun his organizational muscle. The Clark staff scrambles even to collect names of those turning out to see him and apparently lacks the quick follow-up to potential supporters for which Howard Dean's organization is noted.

Private tracking polls suggest that the surge of support everyone noted for Clark in the first half of January may have leveled off as spokesmen for rivals Lieberman, Dean and Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) have begun criticizing the general's consistency and questioning his very recent affiliation with the Democratic Party. Kerry was doing just that Saturday from Iowa.

And it is Kerry whom the Concord Monitor chose to endorse in its Sunday edition, saying he "is prepared to take office tomorrow." Still, no one disputes that in the temporary, two-way fight for attention and support in New Hampshire, Clark has far outdistanced Lieberman.

Geoffrey Garin, the general's pollster, said that when Clark entered the race in mid-September -- long after all the others had begun -- Dean had 43 percent of the New Hampshire primary vote and Clark 5 percent, trailing not only Dean and Kerry, but also Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.) and Sen. John Edwards (N.C.). Less than one-quarter of the voters here said they knew enough about him to make any judgment.

"We have not completely eliminated the disadvantage," Garin said. "But now 59 percent say they know a lot or a good deal about him, and he actually leads Dean within that group."

The gains have come from a relentless emphasis on Clark's biography -- a modest boyhood in Arkansas (somewhat akin to Bill Clinton's), top of his class at West Point, Rhodes scholar, wounded in Vietnam and then a rise to four-star general -- all capsulized in a slick film shown to audiences before Clark speaks.

His speeches bristle with criticism of President Bush, but not of his Democratic rivals, and emphasize the intangible quality of leadership far more than policy positions. As a result, Garin said, he has much lower negative scores than Dean and more even appeal across the ideological spectrum of Democrats and independents, who also can vote in the primary here. The solidity of that reputation will be tested in the final week of campaigning, including a debate.

Lieberman, by contrast, has pursued a different strategy as he has moved into a Manchester apartment for the month. Brian Hardwick, his deputy campaign manager, said Lieberman has spent more time with newspapers around the state, explaining his tax reform plan and other proposals, and focusing on undecided voters at house parties and coffee hours.

Lieberman also has been Dean's most caustic and consistent critic, claiming the mantle of Clintonian "New Democrat" policies for himself and arguing that the former Vermont governor is outside of that successful tradition. Hardwick conceded that "Clark may have been the immediate beneficiary" of the doubts about Dean sown by Lieberman and the Iowa rivals, "but now there are doubts about him [Clark]. We think that in the end, Joe's integrity and consistency over a 30-year career will bring people to him."

But local reporters note that the crowds at Lieberman's events have been small compared with those at Clark's and that he has seemed awkward at times, trying to tie himself to Clinton in an appeal to Democrats but also claiming to independents a political kinship with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the winner of the 2000 GOP primary here.

A rival campaign manager said of Lieberman: "He's not a fresh face and he's got a complex message, and he's been the most negative of all the candidates. None of that has helped him."

_____________________

Staff writer Jonathan Finer contributed to this report.



To: portage who wrote (1207)1/18/2004 12:48:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
Clark lines up support of Clintonites

telegraph.co.uk

(Filed: 18/01/2004)

General Wesley Clark is fast emerging as the Democrat's preferred candidate to take on George W Bush. Julian Coman reports from New Hampshire

It was close to midnight on Friday when Gen Wesley Clark, wearing a thick woolly sweater, bounded into the Nuffield Ale and Steak House in Manchester.

The locals had long departed into a sub-zero New Hampshire evening. But Gen Clark had come in to see a different crowd. For the presidential candidate, some important allies had just come to town.


Gen Wesley Clark: holding fire for New Hampshire primary in nine days' time
"Holy cow, what a rendezvous this is!" cried Gen Clark, as he shook hands with James Rubin, a senior adviser in the State Department under President Clinton. "It's great to see you up here."

Six other senior Clinton officials had made the long journey north to aid the Clark cause. They trooped along to stand beside Gen Clark at an All America Day rally yesterday, braving record cold temperatures in a calculated show of Clintonite support.

A thousand miles away in Iowa, where Democratic Party caucus votes take place tomorrow in the opening contest for the nomination to the White House, a tense four-way battle had developed between Senators John Kerry and John Edwards, ex-governor Howard Dean and Congressman Richard Gephardt. Mr Kerry, a Vietnam veteran, appeared to have opened up a last-minute poll lead over his rivals, threatening a surprise victory.

Gen Clark decided to opt out of that battle, however, keeping his powder dry for the New Hampshire primary - the second, and arguably more important, test of Democrat support - in nine days' time.

Thanks to the strong show of support that rolled up for him this weekend, when Gen Clark's rivals emerge battered and bruised from Iowa, they may feel pitchforked into a battle against Bill Clinton's proxy.

As the general worked his way through the narrow Nuffield bar, beer in hand, veteran Clinton staffers reminisced about the triumphant campaign of 1992, when the first President Bush was defeated.

Discussion soon turned from past glories to future possibilities. The day's New Hampshire polling put Gen Clark in second place at 24 per cent, climbing to within five points of the once runaway frontrunner, Howard Dean.

"It's started to move for us, and it seems like half of Arkansas has turned up to help us out," said one Clark campaign aide. According to a number of Clark campaigners, the advice from the Clinton entourage is simple enough.

Unlike other Democrats, Gen Clark - thanks to his military record - can trump George W Bush on the patriotic theme that the President has made his own: keeping America safe.

On Friday evening, at the Epping Elementary School, it was hard to miss the underlying message - liberals can be patriotic too. The school gym was festooned with Stars and Stripes flags. Not every Democrat meeting begins with the pledge of allegiance to the United States flag, but this one did, to enthusiastic applause.

A 15-minute biographical film guided a standing room-only audience through Gen Clark's years at West Point, his war wounds in Vietnam, his Nato role in the taming of Slobodan Milosevic and the liberation of Kosovo.

His stellar military credentials established, the general himself stepped forward to a standing ovation. To raucous cheers, President Bush's famous appearance on the Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier was quickly mocked.

"It's not patriotic to dress up in a play-suit and prance around the deck of an aircraft carrier," said Gen Clark. "I will keep this country safe because I've been there. I know twice as much about keeping this country safe as anyone currently in office in Washington."

By going to war with Iraq, said Gen Clark, the president threw "a world-class fake and switch", distracting attention from a real threat, Osama bin Laden, by attacking Saddam.

A final, impassioned plea by Gen Clark brought the house down. "I'm worried about our country. This is a dangerous time. But force should never be used as a first resort. It's time to bring an end to the Republicans' monopoly on issues of national security."

Dino Atsaris, an airline pilot, was a convert. "Can you imagine any other Democrat talking like that and being trusted by the majority of the country?" he said. "Dean couldn't do it. What is important is that we find a candidate who canactually beat George Bush."

As the Iowa campaign has become tenser and nastier over recent days, with a flurry of "attack ads" exchanged between competing Democrat candidates, there is a sense of relief in the Clark camp at his decision to sit it out.

The general is biding his time, even having the leisure to sift through possible theme tunes for the coming battles. U2's Pride (In the Name of Love), is the current favourite.

He swims every day at 5.30am, hones his message and polishes his act. Most important, when the political novice finally enters the fray in New Hampshire on January 27, it will be with some expert help.

"President Clinton has been available on a moment's notice to give advice, and respond to any immediate needs we might have," said Eli Segal, a former Clinton White House aide, who now acts as Gen Clark's campaign chairman.

Officially, the Clintons have kept a statesmanlike silence over their preferred candidate to take on George W Bush - but you will not find anyone in Nuffield's Ale and Steak bar who believes that.



To: portage who wrote (1207)1/18/2004 11:01:49 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 1414
 
<<...There are times to vote to make a statement, there are times to vote for the underdog and there are times to vote to save the country from catastrophe. This time we can and must do all three...>>

commondreams.org

Published on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 by MichaelMoore.com
I’ll Be Voting For Wesley Clark: Good-Bye Mr. Bush
by Michael Moore

Many of you have written to me in the past months asking, "Who are you going to vote for this year?"

I have decided to cast my vote in the primary for Wesley Clark. That's right, a peacenik is voting for a general. What a country!

I believe that Wesley Clark will end this war. He will make the rich pay their fair share of taxes. He will stand up for the rights of women, African Americans, and the working people of this country.

And he will cream George W. Bush.

I have met Clark and spoken to him on a number of occasions, feeling him out on the issues but, more importantly, getting a sense of him as a human being. And I have to tell you I have found him to be the real deal, someone whom I'm convinced all of you would like, both as a person and as the individual leading this country. He is an honest, decent, honorable man who would be a breath of fresh air in the White House. He is clearly not a professional politician. He is clearly not from Park Avenue. And he is clearly the absolute best hope we have of defeating George W. Bush.

This is not to say the other candidates won't be able to beat Bush, and I will work enthusiastically for any of the non-Lieberman 8 who might get the nomination. But I must tell you, after completing my recent 43-city tour of this country, I came to the conclusion that Clark has the best chance of beating Bush. He is going to inspire the independents and the undecided to come our way. The hard core (like us) already have their minds made up. It's the fence sitters who will decide this election.

The decision in November is going to come down to 15 states and just a few percentage points. So, I had to ask myself -- and I want you to honestly ask yourselves -- who has the BEST chance of winning Florida, West Virginia, Arizona, Nevada, Missouri, Ohio? Because THAT is the only thing that is going to matter in the end. You know the answer -- and it ain't you or me or our good internet doctor.

This is not about voting for who is more anti-war or who was anti-war first or who the media has already anointed. It is about backing a candidate that shares our values AND can communicate them to Middle America. I am convinced that the surest slam dunk to remove Bush is with a four-star-general-top-of-his-class-at-West-Point-Rhodes-Scholar-Medal-of-Freedom-winning-gun-owner-from-the-South -- who also, by chance, happens to be pro-choice, pro environment, and anti-war. You don't get handed a gift like this very often. I hope the liberal/left is wise enough to accept it. It's hard, when you're so used to losing, to think that this time you can actually win. It is Clark who stands the best chance -- maybe the only chance -- to win those Southern and Midwestern states that we MUST win in order to accomplish Bush Removal. And if what I have just said is true, then we have no choice but to get behind the one who can make this happen.

There are times to vote to make a statement, there are times to vote for the underdog and there are times to vote to save the country from catastrophe. This time we can and must do all three. I still believe that each one of us must vote his or her heart and conscience. If we fail to do that, we will continue to be stuck with spineless politicians who stand for nothing and no one (except those who write them the biggest checks).

My vote for Clark is one of conscience. I feel so strongly about this that I'm going to devote the next few weeks of my life to do everything I can to help Wesley Clark win. I would love it if you would join me on this mission.

Here are just a few of the reasons why I feel this way about Wes Clark:

1. Clark has committed to ensuring that every family of four who makes under $50,000 a year pays NO federal income tax. None. Zip. This is the most incredible helping hand offered by a major party presidential candidate to the working class and the working poor in my lifetime. He will make up the difference by socking it to the rich with a 5% tax increase on anything they make over a million bucks. He will make sure corporations pay ALL of the taxes they should be paying. Clark has fired a broadside at greed. When the New York Times last week wrote that Wes Clark has been “positioning himself slightly to Dean’s left," this is what they meant, and it sure sounded good to me.

2. He is 100% opposed to the draft. If you are 18-25 years old and reading this right now, I have news for you -- if Bush wins, he's going to bring back the draft. He will be forced to. Because, thanks to his crazy war, recruitment is going to be at an all-time low. And many of the troops stuck over there are NOT going to re-enlist. The only way Bush is going to be able to staff the military is to draft you and your friends. Parents, make no mistake about it -- Bush's second term will see your sons taken from you and sent to fight wars for the oily rich. Only an ex-general who knows first-hand that a draft is a sure-fire way to wreck an army will be able to avert the inevitable.

3. He is anti-war. Have you heard his latest attacks on Bush over the Iraq War? They are stunning and brilliant. I want to see him on that stage in a debate with Bush -- the General vs. the Deserter! General Clark told me that it's people like him who are truly anti-war because it's people like him who have to die if there is a war. "War must be the absolute last resort," he told me. "Once you've seen young people die, you never want to see that again, and you want to avoid it whenever and wherever possible." I believe him. And my ex-Army relatives believe him, too. It's their votes we need.

4. He walks the walk. On issues like racism, he just doesn't mouth liberal platitudes -- he does something about it. On his own volition, he joined in and filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan's case in favor of affirmative action. He spoke about his own insistence on affirmative action in the Army and how giving a hand to those who have traditionally been shut out has made our society a better place. He didn't have to get involved in that struggle. He's a middle-aged white guy -- affirmative action personally does him no good. But that is not the way he thinks. He grew up in Little Rock, one of the birthplaces of the civil rights movement, and he knows that African Americans still occupy the lowest rungs of the ladder in a country where everyone is supposed to have "a chance." That is why he has been endorsed by one of the founding members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Charlie Rangel, and former Atlanta Mayor and aide to Martin Luther King, Jr., Andrew Young.

5. On the issue of gun control, this hunter and gun owner will close the gun show loophole (which would have helped prevent the massacre at Columbine) and he will sign into law a bill to create a federal ballistics fingerprinting database for every gun in America (the DC sniper, who bought his rifle in his own name, would have been identified after the FIRST day of his killing spree). He is not afraid, as many Democrats are, of the NRA. His message to them: "You like to fire assault weapons? I have a place for you. It's not in the homes and streets of America. It's called the Army, and you can join any time!"

6. He will gut and overhaul the Patriot Act and restore our constitutional rights to privacy and free speech. He will demand stronger environmental laws. He will insist that trade agreements do not cost Americans their jobs and do not exploit the workers or environment of third world countries. He will expand the Family Leave Act. He will guarantee universal pre-school throughout America. He opposes all discrimination against gays and lesbians (and he opposes the constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage). All of this is why Time magazine this week referred to Clark as "Dean 2.0" -- an improvement over the original (1.0, Dean himself), a better version of a good thing: stronger, faster, and easier for the mainstream to understand and use.

7. He will cut the Pentagon budget, use the money thus saved for education and health care, and he will STILL make us safer than we are now. Only the former commander of NATO could get away with such a statement. Dean says he will not cut a dime out of the Pentagon. Clark knows where the waste and the boondoggles are and he knows that nutty ideas like Star Wars must be put to pasture. His health plan will cover at least 30 million people who now have no coverage at all, including 13 million children. He's a general who will tell those swing voters, "We can take this Pentagon waste and put it to good use to fix that school in your neighborhood." My friends, those words, coming from the mouth of General Clark, are going to turn this country around.

Now, before those of you who are Dean or Kucinich supporters start cloggin' my box with emails tearing Clark down with some of the stuff I've seen floating around the web ("Mike! He voted for Reagan! He bombed Kosovo!"), let me respond by pointing out that Dennis Kucinich refused to vote against the war resolution in Congress on March 21 (two days after the war started) which stated "unequivocal support" for Bush and the war (only 11 Democrats voted against this--Dennis abstained). Or, need I quote Dr. Dean who, the month after Bush "won" the election, said he wasn't too worried about Bush because Bush "in his soul, is a moderate"? What's the point of this ridiculous tit-for-tat sniping? I applaud Dennis for all his other stands against the war, and I am certain Howard no longer believes we have nothing to fear about Bush. They are good people.

Why expend energy on the past when we have such grave danger facing us in the present and in the near future? I don't feel bad nor do I care that Clark -- or anyone -- voted for Reagan over 20 years ago. Let's face it, the vast majority of Americans voted for Reagan -- and I want every single one of them to be WELCOMED into our tent this year. The message to these voters -- and many of them are from the working class -- should not be, "You voted for Reagan? Well, to hell with you!" Every time you attack Clark for that, that is the message you are sending to all the people who at one time liked Reagan. If they have now changed their minds (just as Kucinich has done by going from anti-choice to pro-choice, and Dean has done by wanting to cut Medicare to now not wanting to cut it) – and if Clark has become a liberal Democrat, is that not something to cheer?

In fact, having made that political journey and metamorphosis, is he not the best candidate to bring millions of other former Reagan supporters to our side -- blue collar people who have now learned the hard way just how bad Reagan and the Republicans were (and are) for them?

We need to take that big DO NOT ENTER sign off our tent and reach out to the vast majority who have been snookered by these right-wingers. And we have a better chance of winning in November with one of their own leading them to the promised land.

There is much more to discuss and, in the days and weeks ahead, I will continue to send you my thoughts. In the coming months, I will also be initiating a number of efforts on my website to make sure we get out the vote for the Democratic nominee in November.

In addition to voting for Wesley Clark, I will also be spending part of my Bush tax cut to help him out. You can join me, if you like, by going to his website to learn more about him, to volunteer, or to donate. To find out about when your state’s presidential primaries are, visit Vote Smart.

I strongly urge you to vote for Wes Clark. Let's join together to ensure that we are putting forth our BEST chance to defeat Bush on the November ballot. It is, at this point, for the sake of the world, a moral imperative.

Yours,

Michael Moore