Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (180809)	1/17/2004 1:08:48 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1572372

Can't a closely held corporation just pay out dividends rather than salaries and the recipients avoid SS & medicare taxes and pay a reduced tax rate? The short answer is "No". The IRS has the ability to insist that officer/shareholders take a "reasonable" salary -- i.e., not too much, not too little. If they take too much, a portion will be "deemed" to be "constructive dividends". In the case of a C-Corporation, dividends are undesirable, as the money will be taxed twice (once to the corporation, again to the shareholder as dividend income). In the case of an S-Corporation, dividends (distributions, actually) are not taxed at all, as shareholders are taxed on profits of the corporation. In the past, S-corporation shareholders would take distributions rather than salaries to avoid payroll taxes. Over the past 10 years a substantial body of tax law has evolved which gives the IRS strong enforcement capability in this area. As a CPA I used this tool for years, but always had the shareholders taking SOME salary, but kept it minimal -- it is much more difficult for IRS to argue you didn't take enough salary vs. them saying you took NO salary, which obviously isn't correct. It is a huge subject, though...