SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (89553)1/17/2004 6:04:52 PM
From: orkrious  Respond to of 209892
 
Another bear throws in the Towel
Zenit after predicting crashes for months on end is now calling for DOW 13,500


That's so funny. I remember his continually saying we were going to plunge. 800 naz points ago.



To: mishedlo who wrote (89553)1/17/2004 6:19:16 PM
From: The Freep  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
Mish, I think you're missing the point here a little.

<<Well now, 1 year into the rally and missing it all he says it is only half way.>>

Richard Russell didn't say that. What he said was that Lowry's statistics say that historically, when this buying/selling cross occurs, it usually happens half the way through a rally.

Now, Russell says he's looked at Lowry's daily stats since the 60's. That's maybe 40 years worth of looking. He says they're good. We probably all remember Paul Desmond's stuff that Paul Shread turned us on to. That's Lowry's work, too, and it was proven time and again to be correct. So, when you're faced with something like that... something that has statistical backing and comes from a source you trust... why wouldn't you take it seriously? I would argue that he'd be an idiot to ignore it. Doesn't mean it's right, of course, but isn't the market all about finding the best "odds" via good setups and statistical benchmarks? If you've got one that you trust that's telling you something that has worked through bull and bear market alike, wouldn't YOU take it into account?

In other words, he's missed the first 1500 points of the Dow rally, but he's willing to admit there may be another 1500 points. Makes sense to me.

the freep



To: mishedlo who wrote (89553)1/17/2004 10:55:28 PM
From: skinowski  Respond to of 209892
 
now, 1 year into the rally and missing it

That's not exactly the case, mish. Many moons ago - I don't recall his logic and his arguments - Russell advised his subs to buy 'DIAmonds' if they want to play this rally. Why the DOW? I believe it had to do with the declining dollar and the consideration that major co's with big international exposure would be more likely to benefit.