Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (35606)	1/18/2004 11:46:29 PM
From: laura_bush	Respond to of 89467

THOUGHTS ON THE COMING "DISCOVERY" OF BIN LADEN --The Best Propaganda Money can Buy by Eric A. Smith OpEdNews.Com Unless preparations are made for its eventuality, the announcement of Bin Laden's capture will be the death-knell for the 2004 Democratic campaign. And, like the "heroic rescue" of Jessica Lynch or the toppling of Hussein's statue by "jubilant throngs" of Iraqis, it needn't even be real: news.bbc.co.uk latimes.com informationclearinghouse.info So Democrats must have a pre-emptive strategy in place; the most obvious being, early in the game, to accuse the White House of sitting on Bin Laden for political gain. A better one is to launch an independent investigation to find Bin Laden first and announce the discovery before Rove's political operatives; this would be a huge coup. In case you haven't been paying attention, this election year, Republicans are playing a deadly game of attrition -- death by a thousand tiny cuts, so to speak: extreme reprimanding in Texas, the recall of a governor in California, the installation of inauditable, easily "preprogrammed" DRE e-vote machines in as many counties as will allow them to be stuffed down their throats, relentless and bloody character assassinations in a bought-and-paid-for Murdoch-dominated media empire, absentee ballots counted by an untouchable firm in Kuwait, stacked courts ready to deliver decisions for which 2000's Gore vs. Bush set the precedent. The odds look dire for Democrats (and, by extension, the majority of Americans, though they are as yet blissfully unaware of the slender thread from which all our liberties hang). But, in case you haven't connected the dots, this time the GOP is playing for keeps. Once the fix is in, there will be no turning back: by an invisible, carefully planned coup, the neoconservatives will have transformed America into an autocracy, and any remaining political opposition will be window dressing. And so, I challenge you: this is a battle we perhaps cannot win, but, at all costs, MUST NOT LOSE. The consequences of surrender will be incalculable: one by one, like dominos, institutions we cherish will fall -- environmental laws, social security, independent media, healthy advocacy groups, assistance for the unemployed, impoverished and disenfranchised -- and, foremost, the right to choose our leaders. We will be left with one remaining liberty: the right to choose which products to buy to keep the militaristic money machine well-oiled, and its minders well-heeled. This year, unless YOU act -- BOLDLY, DECISIVELY, PERSISTENTLY AND INCESSANTLY -- the dream our forefathers nurtured to life will die. Don't let the dream die. Stand up and fight for America. Stand up and fight for the vote. This will be your last chance. sincerely, Eric A. Smith Tokyo About the author: Eric A. Smith is a freelance journalist, editor and IT instructor living in Tokyo, Japan. An activist for over 25 years, he has worked with such diverse publications as the RTP Beacon, Common Ground and Adbusters magazine. He can be reached for comment at 81-03-3959-5371 or snowdog@juno.ocn.ne.jp opednews.com

To: lurqer who wrote (35606)	1/18/2004 11:52:40 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

McGovern ran against Nixon, who resigned to avoid impeachment and whose VP (Agnews) was a crook. I'd rather not have a recurrence of the loss of '72, but I wouldn't mind at all the Days of Reckoning for the GOP that followed. I think there are similarities in that Bush and Cheney deserve the same fate as Nixon and Agnews, and McGovern and Clark are both decent and courageous men. I see a difference in that I believe the Democrats will fight much harder and more effectively to defeat Bush than they fought to defeat Nixon. Just look at the excitement and energy right now in Iowa and N.H. I believe that most Dems will get behind whoever ends up with the nomination, and I am certainly hoping that will be Clark...;-)