Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (159912)	1/19/2004 11:27:47 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<< The fact is the economy was great in the Clinton years and lots of great companies emerged from that time. >> Yup, lizzie, you got it - it was a time of dreams .. fantasy .. clinton era .. you're right .. Arthur Andersen pets.com Worldcom/MCI Global crossing Enron Tyco Lucent idealab.com Exodus.com IMCG.com redback networks XO communications etc .. etc .. Giving Clinton credit for all that went right in yesteryear just isn't resonating Lizzie. It sounds like whining.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (159912)	1/19/2004 11:37:14 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Respond to of 164684

Each president is responsible for the good and bad that happens in his term. Then you agree Clinton is to blame for the 52% loss in the Nasdaq his last ten months in office? How about the negative GDP growth in the quarter before the election? Oh, and you'll also agree Bush deserves credit for Q3's 8.2% GDP growth and December's fastest-in-twenty-years manufacturing growth, right? Maybe it would be acceptable if corporate profits weren't at ALL TIME HIGHS. Yeah, it'd be better if corporate profits sucked. LOL.