SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Fleming who wrote (274517)1/20/2004 2:59:17 PM
From: laura_bush  Respond to of 436258
 
Thanks all/explanations re callable 30 yr. bond. :) lb/eom



To: Jim Fleming who wrote (274517)1/20/2004 7:30:01 PM
From: laura_bush  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Reopening talk about the '79 30-yr-bond "called in."

I've spoken to a number of people on SI and IRL who still believe that the Feds are shafting the bag-holders.

This series of remarks summarizes well the input I've received.

Comments appreciated.
________________________________

Premise: "Things like this come with the territory of buying a 30yr Bond. For it to be "called" five years early, is to be 'expected.'"

Response:

Yes indeed. Here's the problem as I see it.

#1. Dubya's being criticized for failing to cut government spending. Looks good by itself, alright.

#2 Problem is that plenty of retired people are living, traveling, and payin their bills based on the notes they bot way back when.

#3 The holders of these debt securities failed to read the fine print...wherein the government reserved the option to redeem the paper.

#4 2/3 of the note holders are private "investors," i.e., little old ladies.

[Edit comment: It would be interesting to hold down GWB and shave his head. Odds are that he has a "666" birthmark under his goofy haircut.]
_____________________________________

What do you sophisticated financiers over here on SI's dark thread think about the above? -g

lb