Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (12228)	1/20/2004 1:34:56 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 14610

nice response

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (12228)	1/20/2004 2:18:34 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

that was superb.. :) btw.... there is no question saddam had WMD. but they remain unaccounted for. The intelligence may have overstated Saddam's present capabilities, but history does not overstate his past deeds or his capacity for truly evil behavior

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (12228)	1/20/2004 4:41:25 PM
From: MrLucky	Respond to of 14610

The silence is deafening...<g>

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (12228)	1/20/2004 7:02:19 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Respond to of 14610

OMD.........1 zonder......minus 1

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (12228)	1/21/2004 5:07:06 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14610

The President who made that speech was Bill Clinton. December 16, 1998 I suspected as much, from your use of the phrase "A US President" in your previous post, but frankly, couldn't be bothered to verify it, so I asked if you were interested in talking about the RECENT invasion and the ONGOING occupation of Iraq, I would be happy to contribute. In any case, I see you have not answered anything else I have said. That is disappointing. I thought we could have an interesting conversation, but it now seems that your interest was only in seeing whether you could get me to think that one president's words were those of the other. So what is your point anyway?