Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (181262)	1/21/2004 4:20:02 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574307

TP, The fibbish part is to try to place this in the context of events that happened long after. It's no less fibbish than second-guessing the motives and the failures of our intelligence community to heed the supposed warnings prior to 9/11. Yet that's exactly what the Clintons were doing when, well after 9/11, they bring up their "warnings" to Bush that they considered Osama to be the most dangerous threat to America. Tenchusatsu

To: TigerPaw who wrote (181262)	1/21/2004 4:28:08 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574307

At the time Osama was in Sudan he was not the 9-11 mastermind as that was way before 9-11 was concieved. He was just guy who might do something wrong but hadn't yet done anything to violate U.S. laws. He had been implicated in the first WTC bombing; if Clinton had WANTED to get him, he could have done so. Clinton didn't have the will to do it because he was a political being who couldn't take a piss if it wasn't politically popular to do so. Bush, on the other hand, knows right from wrong and doesn't allow the politics of the situation to influence the process. That's reality.