Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hoyasaxa who wrote (176621)	1/21/2004 6:19:50 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

OT I would argue that eating meat is immoral, and on many levels. Even if you do not buy the argument that animals have rights(as I do), then surely you can look at the facts and come to the same conclusion that eating meat is wrong. An example: Roughly two-thirds of the world's population has no access to clean drinking water. It takes thousands of gallons of fresh water just to produce approximately 1 pound of "choice" beef. This while people are dying from dysentery. Surely even the most closed minded person can view these facts and call these practices immoral. Re: pretty ludicrous... Ludicrous is when people ignore the facts so that they can continue with an immoral lifestyle which is to their liking. Brian PS. Before you call me names as you have done in previous posts of people whose views disagree with yours, let me add that I was a voracious meat-eater for years.....that is, until I came to the conclusion that it was immoral. I liked meat but gave it up anyway because not to do so would be wrong.