SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave who wrote (24627)1/21/2004 6:23:31 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Dave, as I noted in my previous response, PE is just one of many ways to determine if the stock price is reasonable. I also noted that I prefered change in book value per share as a measurement of what the shareholders get from their investment. This isn't perfect either, because companies with a lot of proprietary technology don't show much value for their patents on the books. They show research expenses, but the patent itself is not valued as if it were land or buildings. Thus, the true value of SNDK assets (i.e., the intrinsic value) is greater than the figure for shareholder equity.

OK, so where is the pessimism in this report? Looks to me like the prospect of lower margins turned off some investors. Also some investors may have misinterpreted the projected average selling prices of flash memory, assuming this indicates predatory pricing, when in fact it shows improvements in technology and manufacturing efficiency. It's just another version of Moore's Law.

Taking all of these measures together, plus the subjective aspects that are difficult to quantify, including the technical problems in producing NAND chips, the stock looks grossly undervalued, with one exception. And that is the condition of the whole stock market and the economy. If the stock market remains fairly strong through the election, as I expect, I see no reason why SNDK can't reach about $90.

Art



To: Dave who wrote (24627)1/21/2004 9:33:14 PM
From: BWAC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Just the same, this market is sooo broken as an investing medium. I bought some at 59 for the first time, but it'll probably power on down to below 50 just for the hell of it.