Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (181284)	1/21/2004 8:02:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574492

Ted, Al, David, TigerPaw, and all, before I try to defend the indefensible, let me say this: I don't believe there was indeed anything that Clinton or Bush could have reasonably done to capture Osama or otherwise prevent 9/11. Both sides of the fence are making accusations at each other based on hindsight, but the truth is that America *in general* was caught with her guard down. My original post to Al was meant to be a turnaround of his own words, including his failure (unintentional?) to capitalize the name "george." Apparently no one caught on, and I even tried to say later on that "Clinton was just as 'responsible' (notice the quotes) for 9/11 as Bush was." In other words, I'm saying they weren't, but as John Fowler mentioned, the thinking on this thread tends to be pretty linear. Tenchusatsu