Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (181328)	1/22/2004 8:54:05 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574302

And you have the unmitigated gall to say that I am polarizing this thread. The thread is no more polarized than the rest of the nation. Bush came to office with the promise to unify Washington...and then we learned more about him. Al

To: tejek who wrote (181328)	1/22/2004 12:26:28 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574302

Ted RE..You haven't been here in months, and after two days, you make that summation. Sorry, Harry, you're not that good! Hey, I just agreed with you. How often do I do that? And here you are giving me hell. Nice guy you are. What I remember for nearly two years after 9/11 is the right calling everyone and their bro who did not agree with them traitors The incident I was referring to happened well before that, in Feb. of 2001. Did you expect everybody, on this board to conveniently forget about what you said then. He did not win the most popular votes Tell me something, does the winner of the popular votes, or the winner of the electoral votes win the presidency? Does the football team, which has the most yards gained, or the team with the most points on the board win the game. And quit crying over spilled milk. In a democracy the loser are supposed to accept the winner, until they have a chance to win the presidency back. Now you want to insist that you don't have to accept GW as president, because GW didn't win according to your rules. And you dems think that will make you a winner, in the next elections? Unbelievable. yet he and his minions and his supporters act like he won by the largest plurality in the history of the US Call me an idiot, but here I am agreeing with you again. Yes GW is acting like he won the election by 50 electoral votes, not just one. It takes a good set of balls to do that; so to speak. Too bad you can't say the same for the flipflop artists you dems are trying to win with; maybe you would stand a chance. There are a lot of us who are angry. I don't know if we have the numbers to unseat him but we're going to make every effort. Deal with it! The voters in Iowa already did. They sent Dean, and his angry dem. message into the sewer where it belongs.