Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: laura_bush who wrote (35940)	1/22/2004 3:51:43 AM
From: techguerrilla	Respond to of 89467

We're on the same wavelength, Laura, ... ... as usual. Equal crudeness, too. I like Clark and Kerry. But I just think that, given time, Edwards is the most electable. Clark is a true political stud. But his campaign has simply sputtered after such early "Great Expectations." Kerry whines too much. I think Edwards, like Kerry, voted to give Dubya Iraqi war powers. One of these days, Edwards is going to have to confront questions about that vote. I remember when that vote was taken. If you didn't vote with Dubya, the whole nation thought you were a traitor. Dubya has terrorized the whole country into agreeing with him--or you're a traitor! Dubya is the first politician I have truly hated. I didn't like Reagan. But I detest Dubya. /john P.S. Dean will give us a "decent" showing in New Hampshire, then get clobbered in South Carolina. He will then be perceived as thoroughly unelectable. Zero electoral votes south of the Mason-Dixon line. (Edwards would win quite a few Southern states.) P.P.S. Lieberman is a political nonentity!!! So is Gephardt. P.P.P.S. Blowing gaskets? Ummm! Clark? I don't see it. (Edwards is rock steady and will never blow a gasket.)