Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : LNG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (36)	1/23/2004 8:19:14 AM
From: Dennis Roth	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 919

Feds approve Bahamas to Broward natural gas pipeline sun-sentinel.com [ This is for an LNG port in the Bahamas ] By David Fleshler Staff Writer Posted January 23 2004 AES Corp. widened its lead in the race to build a natural gas pipeline from the Bahamas to Broward County Thursday when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission gave the project final approval. The commission voted 4-0 to approve the Ocean Express pipeline, which would carry natural gas from Ocean Cay in the southern Biminis to South Florida, where it would serve as fuel for power plants. The pipeline still needs approval from the government of the Bahamas, where environmentalists say they will continue to fight it. The company expects to start work this summer and put the pipeline into operation by August 2006. The commission, a board appointed by President Bush, approved the pipeline without discussion, said Tamara Young-Allen, a spokeswoman. The commission included a long list of environmental-protection conditions in its draft order approving the project. AES is competing with two other companies to build pipelines to serve the region's growing demand for natural gas to produce electricity. El Paso Corp. has proposed a pipeline from Grand Bahamas to the Port of Palm Beach, while Tractebel North America has proposed one from Freeport to Dania Beach. AES's victory Thursday makes it the first of the three to win final approval. "We're excited," said Aaron Samson, project director for AES. "We think we can do this and meet the conditions in the certificate." Samson said the extensive environmental controls imposed by the commission and the company would limit harm to the environment. Under each proposal, countries that produce natural gas, such as Nigeria and Trinidad, would send it in liquid form by tanker to the Bahamas. Processing plants would convert it back to gas and send it through the pipelines to South Florida, where smaller pipes would carry it to power plants. Environmentalists generally support the use of natural gas because it emits far less pollution when burned than oil or coal. But some environmentalists in Florida oppose the pipeline as a threat to coral reefs, sea grass and other natural resources. Rosalyn Scherf, a Hollywood resident who circulated a petition against the project, said she was disappointed at the energy commission's decision. "That makes my heart sink," she said. "With the hurricanes and weather, I can't believe they would put it here. They're making a big mistake, and unfortunately they won't find out that until something goes wrong. And then everyone will say how sorry they are, and then it will be too late." The draft order approved Thursday by the commission contains extensive requirements for environmental safeguards. The order requires the company to file a plan for limiting damage to reefs from equipment if there's a storm. It requires detailed mapping of exposed hardbottom and coral reef habitats. It requires the company to conduct surveys for wood storks, brown pelicans and wading birds and establish buffer zones before any construction in their habitats. "There's a lot of controls," said Samson, of AES. It's possible more than one pipeline will get built or that none will get built -- if the Bahamas government suddenly decides they're too risky. But Samson said the company expects Bahamas approval soon. Sam Duncombe, director of ReEarth, a Bahamas environmental group, said the commission's vote Thursday increased the chances the Bahamas government would approve it. She said the people of the Bahamas have had very little chance to review or comment on their government's environmental study, which could only be reviewed at government offices in Nassau. "It puts enormous pressure on our government to allow them to go ahead, without us being able to be involved," Duncombe said. "I'm totally frustrated." She said the Bahamas was getting the riskiest parts of the project, with the tankers and gas processing plant. Even though the gas plant would be located on remote, uninhabited Ocean Cay, she was concerned about accidents. "If it blows -- and everybody is saying the safety record is impeccable -- but if it blows, what is going to be the impact on the marine resources?" she asked. David Fleshler can be reached at dfleshler@sun-sentinel.com or 954-356-4535. Email story Print story Copyright © 2004,

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (36)	3/1/2004 8:02:49 PM
From: Dennis Roth	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 919

McMoRan Exploration Co. Submits Deepwater Port License Application for LNG Terminal & Natural Gas Storage Facilities at Main Pass Energy Hub biz.yahoo.com Monday March 1, 8:30 am ET NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 1, 2004--McMoRan Exploration Co. (NYSE:MMR - News) announced today that its wholly owned subsidiary Freeport-McMoRan Energy LLC has submitted its license application, which is pending acceptance by the U. S. Coast Guard, to develop a $440 million liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal located at its Main Pass Energy Hub(TM), offshore in the Gulf of Mexico 37 miles east of Venice, Louisiana. The proposed terminal would be capable of receiving and conditioning 1 billion cubic feet (bcf) per day of LNG and is being designed to accommodate potential future expansions. McMoRan is also planning additional investments to develop significant cavern storage for natural gas and pipeline interconnects to the U.S. pipeline distribution system. This would allow significant storage capacity of natural gas using the massive salt dome located at the site and would provide suppliers with access to premium natural gas markets in the U.S. Aggregate peak deliverability from the proposed terminal, including deliveries from storage would total 2.5 bcf per day. The application has been filed under the U.S. Deepwater Port Act, which was amended in 2002 to include deepwater gas ports such as MPEH(TM) and contains a 356-day review period for a decision on the issuance of a license. The license process is under the administration of the U.S. Coast Guard. James R. Moffett and Richard C. Adkerson, Co-Chairmen of McMoRan, said "The submission of this application is an important milestone for the development of our Main Pass Energy Hub(TM) project, which would provide a gateway for required LNG imports into the U.S. natural gas distribution system. We are encouraged by the streamlined permitting process outlined in the Deepwater Port Act and recent approvals of other offshore projects. We look forward to our continued work with the U.S Coast Guard to obtain a license for our project, which offers attractive opportunities for LNG suppliers, U.S. natural gas consumers and our shareholders." "I believe that this project will not only help provide a much-needed supply of natural gas for our state's industries, but will also have significant economic benefits for the state," Louisiana Governor Kathleen Babineaux Blanco said. "Over its life, McMoRan will invest hundreds of millions of dollars on this project, an investment that will result in 1,000 direct and secondary jobs for Louisiana workers." U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu said "This project is good news for Louisianians, our state, and our country. It will create work - as many as 18,000 jobs during the construction phase. It's good for our economy, because Liquefied Natural Gas is expected to be a significant component of the natural gas supply on which so many industries in Louisiana depend. It's good for our future, because it will continue to secure Louisiana's place at the forefront of supplying the energy that runs our country." MPEH(TM) is located at Main Pass Block 299 in 210 feet of water which allows deepwater access for large LNG tankers and is in close proximity to shipping channels. McMoRan will utilize the substantial existing platforms and infrastructure at the site, which were designed to withstand a 200-year storm event, to locate the LNG vaporization and surface storage facilities, providing significant construction timing advantages and cost savings. The facilities could be operational by late-2007, which would make MPEH(TM) one of the first U.S. offshore LNG facilities. Safety and security aspects of the facility are enhanced by its remote location. MPEH(TM) is being designed to include significant cavern storage of natural gas using its massive 2-mile diameter salt dome. The ability to offer significant natural gas storage, which would initially include 28 bcf of cavern storage, offers excellent opportunities to achieve added value for LNG imports and provides security of supply and peaking capabilities for downstream customers. Peak deliverability for the regasification and storage facilities would total 2.5 bcfd. McMoRan continues to pursue commercial arrangements for the facilities and has been engaged in active discussions with potential LNG suppliers and natural gas consumers. There is significant interest in the project and McMoRan expects to advance these discussions in parallel with the permitting process. The MPEH(TM) project would provide significant economic benefits for the State of Louisiana and the U.S. The project is expected to create up to 1,300 direct jobs during the construction phase and economists estimate 18,000 jobs will be created by the direct and secondary spending during construction. Once operational, the project is estimated to result in 1,000 direct and secondary jobs. Additionally, the direct and secondary impact of the facility would total $4 billion over the life of the project. McMoRan Exploration Co. is an independent public company engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and onshore in the Gulf Coast area. Additional information about McMoRan and MPEH(TM) is available on our internet websites "www.mcmoran.com" and "www.mpeh.com". CAUTIONARY STATEMENT: This press release contains certain forward-looking statements regarding the potential Main Pass Energy Hub(TM) project and the related permitting process. Accuracy of the forward-looking statements depends on assumptions about events that change over time and is thus susceptible to periodic change based on actual experience and new developments. McMoRan cautions readers that it assumes no obligation to update or publicly release any revisions to the projections in this press release. Important factors that might cause future results to differ from these projections include: the feasibility of the potential Main Pass Energy Hub(TM) and the ability to obtain significant project financing and regulatory approvals for such project. Such factors and others are more fully described in more detail in McMoRan's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K and McMoRan's recent Registration Statement on Form S-3, both on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Contact: McMoRan Exploration Co., New Orleans Financial Relations: David P. Joint, 504-582-4203 or Media Relations: William L. Collier, 504-582-1750 Source: McMoRan Exploration Co.