Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (35949)	1/22/2004 10:01:04 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Respond to of 89467

BUSHGREENWATCH Tracking the Bush Administration's Environmental Misdeeds bushgreenwatch.org ************************************* January 22, 2004 WHITE HOUSE SEEKING CONTROL OVER SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH RESEARCH WHICH SHAPES FEDERAL POLICIES This is the second of two articles on this subject. The first appeared yesterday. Environmental and health studies conducted for or used by the federal government would require White House approval before their release, under a proposal now under review at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The plan would also give the White House authority to select which scientists take part in the system known as peer review -- the process by which fellow researchers evaluate the validity and reliability of studies before they are published. Critics fear such a plan would undermine the impartiality of research that guides government policies and regulations. For example, it would open the door for the Administration to hand-select industry-friendly scientists to review studies that investigate the safety of chemicals in our food and consumer products, or studies that examine the environmental impact of energy plant emissions. The White House has frequently expressed its commitment to easing regulations for American industries. [1] In a January 9 letter to the OMB, 20 former top federal agency officials, from both Democratic and Republican administrations, urged the White House to drop its proposal. The letter -- signed by former EPA Administrators Carol Browner and Russell Train; former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich; former Assistant Secretaries for Occupational Safety and Health Eula Bingham and Gerard Scannell; and others -- warned that the proposal, "in its current form, could damage the federal system for protecting public health and the environment." [2] Currently, each federal agency controls peer review of its own projects. The government's rules to ensure research quality are already less stringent than those used by leading biomedical journals. For example, these journals require authors to disclose who paid for the research; and the journals will only publish studies done under contracts in which the investigators have the right to publish regardless of the results. Federal agencies do not have these requirements, nor do they consistently attempt to find out who paid for the studies. [3] Far from ensuring the validity of the peer review process, the plan's critics assert that allowing the White House to control it would only add a layer of politics to what should be a purely scientific process. [4] ### SOURCES: [1] "White House Seeks Control on Health, Safety," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Jan. 11, 2004, ga3.org [2] Letter to Joshua B. Bolton, Director of the OMB from 20 former agency officials, Jan 9, 2004, ga3.org [3] Michaels D, Wagner W. Disclosure in Regulatory Science. Science. 2003; 302:2073. [4] "Peer Review Plan Draws Criticism," Washington Post, Jan. 15, 2004, ga3.org *********************************** :: SEND TO A FRIEND ga3.org :: READ BACK ISSUES ga3.org ************************************* BushGreenwatch 1320 18th Street NW 5th Floor Washington, DC 20036 (202) 463-6670 Web site comments: info@bushgreenwatch.org Copyright (c) 2003 Environmental Media Services -------------------------------------------------- If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for BushGreenwatch at: ga3.org --------------------------------------------------