SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SARS and Avian Flu -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Metcalf who wrote (1276)1/23/2004 11:10:38 PM
From: Biomaven  Respond to of 4232
 
I can't even postulate an investment based on this reading of the information

Well there's always Gilead/Roche with Tamiflu (a neuraminidase inhibitor) - likely that would work for Avian flu as well. But I assume supplies are too limited for it to have much impact in any real epidemic.

Peter



To: John Metcalf who wrote (1276)1/24/2004 7:49:36 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 4232
 
>>I would point out that Henry has scooped the world press on re-emergence of SARS and related infections, that he started last summer, and that SI has documentation superior to any print medium in the world both in timeliness (instant) and comprehensiveness. Perhaps someone from Wall Street Journal would like to read this work, and followup with some questions to World Health Organization<<

Just a few clarifications on "scooping" the press and WHO are in order. I do run a few free news groups (via e-mail which actually trace back to the anthrax attacks in 2001) and when the SARS story began to break, a separate SARS group was formed. This group had both news and commentary and subscribers included many scientists working on SARS as well as most of the worldwide media covering SARS.

When the volume of e-mails expanded, the SARS group was divided into two groups, SARS News and SARS Science. The News group is primarily SARS stories, while the SARS Science group has commentary. When the avian flu began generating considerable interest, a flu News group was formed (the Science group still has commentary on both and has many of the posts put up at

discuss.agonist.org
(this was initially just SARS, but just changed its title to emerging diseases because of the abundance of recent avian flu posts).

This thread on SI however is the most comprehensive in the investment area.

As far as scooping is concerned, the various news groups get the news slightly ahead of the boards and the membership of the news group does include most of the major media covering SARS or avian flu, and that includes many WSJ reporters, both in the US and Asia. WHO also receives the news and many of the scientists do advise WHO and CDC on the science side (and if you get the posts to the news group you can see the origin of some media stories and press releases).

If you want to join any or all of the three groups, just drop me an e-mail ( henry_niman@hms.harvard.edu ), indicating which group and e-mail address to use (the volume of e-mail is news dependent, and right now the flu news is generating quite a few e-mails).



To: John Metcalf who wrote (1276)1/24/2004 10:01:32 AM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4232
 
Here are some of the more confusing and provocative H5N1 reports

discuss.agonist.org