To: hmaly who wrote (181515 ) 1/25/2004 10:35:58 AM From: Road Walker Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576346 hmaly, re: Of course they do. But saying a soldier is"thinking about survival"; is saying something different from what you first said which is men are out there in Iraq are trying to figure out a way to survive; which has a different meaning. In the first meaning, you are saying the soldiers think about the best ways to do their job,and of course they do. In the second, you are implying that the soldiers don't know how to survive yet, and are hunkered down in their base camp, too afraid to go out, because they are having trouble figuring out how to survive. What if I said the same thing about you? John is investing in the stock market, and he is trying to figure out a way to survive. Which is fundamentally different form me saying; "John thinks the best way to survive is to think, be one step ahead of the crowd, and take profits. In the first, that implies, that you, like the rest of us the last 3 yrs, don't have a successful strategy in place, and you was in survival mode, trying to protect profits, until the market turns and you could make money. The second implies that you already have a successful survival strategy figured out, and it is just a matter of applying your strategy properly, to maximize your profits. The National Nitpicking Championship this year is being held in Denver. I think you have a shot at the title. re: I thought you was talking about the average draftee, being smarther than the average professional soldier; in which case, I totally disagree. The main reason is, the professional soldier has a different mindset, than the draftee. No matter how smart someone is, if he doesn't care, he very likely won't do as well as, as someone does care, and has a good attitude. You are contradicting yourself Mr. Nitpicker, which is it, "smarther" or "good attitude"? I happen to believe that if you take an random sample of the US public, you will probably get a higher average IQ than you have in the all volunteer army. You disagree, no way to prove it one way or the other. re: Oops, your train just broke a wheel and went off the track. There are justifiable reasons for going to war. That doesn't mean we're not still responsible, as a citizen. Just because you make a cost / benefit analysis you are still responsible. re: However combat is no place for participatory democracy. In fact, the military chain of command is a strict hierarchy command structure; and the US has been very successful with it. I didn't say in "combat", I said in the soldier selection process. Can't you get anything right? re: What intellectual debate? You are proving your own point. re: Think about this. How did we defeat communism? Economics, not war. re: Actually the term "chicken hawk" was coined by the so called intellectuals on the left, who have proven themselves to be utterly devoid of intellectual capacity. It was? Which one? re: Did you know the West Wing is being cancelled for low ratings. Low ratings because Sheen, as president, in the series, is decisive, aware of the geopolitics involved,and willing to use force when necessary. In real life Sheen is seen as a wuss, who couldn't make a decisive decision, if a million votes depended upon it. Yea, so? John