Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (36264)	1/25/2004 9:12:25 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

Just an observation. So far the "resistance" in Iraq has been quite savvy in choosing it's targets. Based on my continuing scan of the world's media, I believe that currently the "biggest bang for the buck" would be an attack against the Japanese SDF. Located in southern Iraq, they may not be an easy target, but a significant loss of life there might force a Japanese withdrawal, and that would give the "Coalition" a "black eye". JMO lurqer

To: lurqer who wrote (36264)	1/25/2004 11:42:48 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

"further, if you want to claim that both parties are guilty of this, fine" First that's no excuse for what the left wing has done. I don't trust politicians to be truthful. However, I can find a mountain of lies from the left wing with no problems at all. They are all easily verifiable. When folks allege lies from the Bush Admin of any significance, it is almost always found to be based on lies from the left wing & there is no basis in fact. You complain about my 32 links to a plethora of flagrant lies by the left wing. They have sold out in the name of partisan politics. We are talking immoral, unethical & treacherous lies & deceit. There can be no other logical explanation other than the ends justify the means form of partisan politics at the expense of national security. Where are an equivalent number verifiable lies by the Bush Admin? Heck, how about 1/2 as many? How about 1/4? 1/8? Bottom line. If the Bush Admin was actually telling egregious lies like the articles I linked, every media outlet on the globe would be repeating them 24/7 & providing everyone the evidence to prove them. They aren't. Why aren't they doing this? Because there aren't any that are of any significance.