To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (176651 ) 1/27/2004 3:18:01 AM From: Amy J Respond to of 186894 Hi Lizzie, RE: "We have more engineers than can find work in a fairly robust growth environment in technology, not to mention the famous 8% GDP." How many are they graduating in the science fields (math, cs, physics, etc.) now at Berkeley & Stanford? I suspect they'll get absorbed this year, certainly next year, if the hum on some of these new technologies is any indicator. RE: "are new college grads and blue collar men from the rust belt. siliconvalley.com This speaks to the need for new innovation in universities. When we pause on innovation, wages drop in the USA. I'm surprised the article wasn't titled, "when innovation slows down, wages sink, so lets increase RND to increase wages" RE: "So to claim that only mature industries are moving offshore doesn't really wash." Startups too. As you know, $105k for an NCG with 0 yrs of experience was too much risk for a startup to absorb. RE: " New engineering graduates who are interested in VoIP have to be looking at this and wondering what their future is in the USA." Lots of creative things happening in VoIP. It's not often a system changes overnight, and everyone is on the same bandwagon. RE: "offshore indian employees are exempt from both US and Indian tax" Huh? Indian taxes are way higher than ours. Which is another reason why you never see me expressing concern about India's stock option treatment, only China is a concern here. RE: "These are things that can really help matters but from what I can see... nobody has suggested it (at least no tech CEO)- how come?" If payroll taxes dropped, Corporations would be stiffed with the tax bill in a variant form. So, the only one who benefits are consultants. ( If the SS payroll tax is removed from consultants, employees might depart companies and turn into consultants just for that extra 7%. So doubt hightech could advocate this. ) RE: "I thought stock options were a way to level the financial playing field for US engineers" For us it does. RE: " I think msft's decision to move offshore" MS has not "moved offshore." Spoke recently with half a dozen divisions, they are all here. As stated in news reports, Internationalization is done overseas. There is new hiring in the USA and overseas as the world is now global. They better know their customers. What happens when demand goes back up? You said Clinton grew jobs by 300,000/month, yet there are only 300,000 graduates per year and 5,000 Sci PhDs per year, and there are say 1M unemployed hightech people - how many are still available to hire? Regards, Amy J