SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TideGlider who wrote (530167)1/26/2004 9:30:46 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
but what makes "corparate" synonymous with Republicans?

The main pork is corporate pork going to Bush industries. Drugs/Pharma, big farming, oil/coal (energy bill) and of course our friend Halliburton. This is the big chunk of the 500 billion Bush has spent. Nothing for your average citizen or student, nothing for the long term unemployed who has been devastated under BushCo. ALL CORPORATE pork.

Now look at the tax cuts, who got them. Dividend tax cut - those that invest in smokestack industries (BushCo), disproportionate skew towards high wage earners.

Take this together and one thing is clear, the *little guy* got a big goose egg from the Bush looting. Bush spent the money on big corps and high earners, now they should have to pay back to compensate for all the pork. I sure as heck am not interesting in paying for this BushCo bonanza.



To: TideGlider who wrote (530167)1/27/2004 7:57:34 AM
From: tonto  Respond to of 769667
 
Lizzie obvious has little economic background and does not use government abuse through history in her criteria. She is caught up in her party thing which makes her bias so strong she cannot recognize the true problems. She is not being honest with herself.

Both parties are responsible for pork barrel spending, but what makes "corparate" synonymous with Republicans?