Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (530300)	1/27/2004 12:36:58 AM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

2/3 of 25% of the electorate fits right in with my prediction: Bush will push the 80% mark in the popular vote in November, 2004. The American public is extremely PISSED OFF at the treason and corruption of the anti-American Democrat party. They will fully express this in November...

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (530300)	1/27/2004 4:43:14 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 769670

Bush's Betrayal buzzflash.com

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (530300)	1/27/2004 8:18:12 AM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 769670

>>>WASHINGTON - A small group composed mostly of retired CIA officers is appealing to colleagues still inside to go public with any evidence the Bush administration is slanting intelligence to support its case for war with Iraq. They also say the administration's public evidence about the immediacy of Iraq's threat to the United States and its alleged ties to al-Qaida is unconvincing, and accuse policy-makers of pushing out some information that does not meet an intelligence professional's standards of proof. "It's been cooked to a recipe, and the recipe is high policy," said Ray McGovern, a 27-year CIA veteran who briefed top Reagan administration security officials before retiring in 1990. "That's why a lot of my former colleagues are holding their noses these days."<<< kansascity.com How can Kay (see his recent statements) fault the US intelligence when the feeling going around the intelligence agency last March was that the Administration was cooking the intelligence books?