Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (181633)	1/27/2004 7:30:48 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575733

Ten, re: No, it means there is a disagreement over the extent of the threat. Disagreement is a mild word. The countries that opposed the invasion have been proven right, no immediate threat, no WMD's. re: It is to me too. The difference is that I think it's worth it. I don't, regardless of the outcome for Iraq. But in the next 6 months, 2 years, 5 years we will see what the ultimate "benefit" was from the soldiers sacrifice, the monetary sacrifice, and the political sacrifice. re: We can't be GloboCop, so we'll need to apply our standards selectively. Impose is a better word than "apply". So the US is now a "selective" "GloboCop"? re: What reason does HRW have when they apply their standard selectively? Human rights are human rights; there should be no double-standard. You are right there, if that is what they are doing. I care much more about what our government does. John