SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (176679)1/27/2004 8:09:03 AM
From: rkral  Respond to of 186894
 
OT .. GVTucker, re "I was in high school two and a half decades ago, and I was learning calculus starting in my sophomore year ..."

Gee, thanks for making me feel disadvantaged and old. My high school didn't even offer calculus mumbleMumble decades ago. :-) The highest level "math" course was solid geometry, I think.

Ron



To: GVTucker who wrote (176679)1/28/2004 4:04:59 AM
From: Amy J  Respond to of 186894
 
OT Hi GV, RE: "I would disagree strongly with this."

Hm, wouldn't be so complacent, when it comes to being internationally competitive.

Our sand hill folks here definitely recognize this.

The pipeline of students is made up of more than just one individual family. The pipeline's volume for hightech is dependent upon whether or not the system is a competitive system. (Key point being "volume", not individual.)

If the pipeline isn't adequately fed, businesses are forced to seek other lands.

Even in your high school example, Indian IIT students are two years ahead. They take Calculus in 8th grade, not 10th.

Math classes need to be bumped up for everyone every decade or quarter century.

It's perfectly normal to have an adjustment, every so often. My Mom said this adjustment has always been happening even before her time - every quarter of a century, a math course gets bumped up into an earlier age. Our system is long overdue for a change. You get what you expect.

Regards,
Amy J