Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (530705)	1/27/2004 3:38:32 PM
From: steve dietrich	Respond to of 769670

It seems that those who glorify war and combat, are most often the ones who haven't experienced combat.

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (530705)	1/27/2004 3:39:08 PM
From: redfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

If I had my druthers, I would make it a requirement that before a President swears in he has to spend a night at the Vietnam War Memorial. That thing really brings it home.

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (530705)	1/27/2004 3:44:41 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

cny, I know that there are many more like you, and it makes one wonder why the supposed liberal media are keeping you invisible, both before and after this oil-grabbing invasion. Del

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (530705)	1/27/2004 3:50:34 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

I think it ironic that in the end all saddam's links to terrorist and terror and even a possible link directly to 9/11 may leave all the dems holding a bag of ripe fecal matter... hehehe... so dare is no WMD. Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2004 10:58 a.m. EST Kay: Bush Was Right to Attack Iraq Critics of the Bush administration have seized on Iraq weapons hunter David Kay's pronouncement over the weekend that Baghdad didn't have any WMDs immediately before the U.S. attacked last March. But Tuesday morning Kay gave President Bush a full-fledged endorsement on his decision to go to war. In an interview with NBC's "Today Show," Kay told host Matt Lauer that the U.S. decision to attack was "absolutely prudent." "In fact," said Kay, "I think at the end of the inspection process, we'll paint a picture of Iraq that was far more dangerous than even we thought it was before the war." Kay described Iraq's government as "a system collapsing." "It was a country that had the capability in weapons of mass destruction areas, and ... terrorists, like ants to honey, were going after it." Meanwhile, Saddam Hussein "was putting more money into his nuclear program, he was pushing ahead his long-range missile program as hard as he could," Kay said. Although Baghdad wasn't successful, Kay said Iraq "had the intent to acquire these weapons," adding that Saddam had "invested huge amounts of money" to do so. The chief weapons hunter also debunked the notion that the White House pressured U.S. intelligence to exaggerate the Iraq threat. "The tendency to say, well, it must have been pressure from the White House is absolutely wrong," he told "Today." newsmax.com

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (530705)	1/27/2004 4:00:39 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 769670

You phony. The best part of you ran down your mother's leg.

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (530705)	1/27/2004 4:04:07 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769670

You speak for yourself, lying dirtbag....you certainly don't speak for the overwhelming majority of our troops who are solidly behind GWB...