Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (123808)	1/27/2004 8:03:12 PM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

My point was I said the Scientists fooled Saddam and told him they had made him weapons, when they really had not. you say: by constantly claiming that the sanctions and international pressure were preventing them from achieving substantial results The difference is that there were zero weapons and the scientists told him there were many.(He forgot about "trust but verify") Your version is that they were building some but they were late. (Late Scientists lost not only the project but their life.) {I wonder if Chalabi was getting paid by both sides, telling both sides there are WMD.} The article doesn't say anything about sanctions and international pressure. If Bush would have known sanctions and international pressure worked then he would have not had to invade and occupy Iraq. Oh, wait a minute. Bush does know about the success of sanctions and international pressure. Check his North Korea Policy. Another thing BUsh learned is that it's a good idea to give "inspectors time to finish the job". Too bad Blix didn't get the same support. Did you see the look on Bush today when he gave the "Glad Saddam's Gone" talking points? Rascal @StaringYouInTheFace.com