Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (123858)	1/28/2004 11:48:03 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

No no to saddam; no no to america is just fine with me if these folks can run things for themselves. Hope the country doesnt split into components though or stray to far from democracy. The big fault of american policy thought right now by this admin is thinking that iraq shiites will be a mirror image of what happened in iran. First of all iran is visible history for the shiite leaders. And secondly, if one wants to keep iraq as a country, you can have rule by shiite ayotollah. The iranian ayotllah could maintain power in a homogenous country--in iraq it is impossible unless the choose separation which is unlikely. There are large numbers of shiites in bagdad and the triangle as i understand it. mike