SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chispas who wrote (6383)1/28/2004 7:47:49 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
The Really Big Statement: From Tanigaki, Not Greenspan
Fleck

Overnight markets were a nonevent, though preopening our futures were higher, and able to shrug off drops in both mortgage applications and, unexpectedly, new-home sales. Though the market went down yesterday, I guess that in their giddy frame of mind, the bulls figured it should not go down two days in a row, especially on a day when they assumed Easy Al, the kiddies' pal, would tell them he'll stay easy forever. So, the early going saw a bounce of about 0.5% for the major indices. Tech was leading the charge, with the Sox up a couple percent, while housing stocks were taking it on the chin.

Of Rhetoric & Downtick

The market flopped and chopped as it awaited the Fed's communique. Then, folks collectively gasped when Al and the boys uttered the dirty words that in fact someday, they just might, maybe raise rates. The exact panic-inspiring phrase was not a phrase at all but the omission of "a considerable period" -- thereby implying that rates would go up at some point. I guess this rattled folks because the Fed has always suggested it will always tell you what it's going to tell you before it actually tells you, if you follow all that.

The stock bulls tossed stocks over the side, and we went out on the low tick. A check of the box scores shows that the market was down pretty much 1.5% across the board. Beneath the surface, however, the story was a little bit different. Tech stocks, as represented by the Sox, did well, with Micron the flying pig higher on the day. But housing stocks were absolutely destroyed, down 5%, plus or minus. Of course, they were already in trouble before we heard what the Fed had to say. Some cyclical stocks were also roughed up, as were the financials. Precious-metal stocks were lower, too, for reasons that will be clear in a minute.

Just Graze Marks from Raised Rates?

Meanwhile, the Fed news does not strike me as tumultuous as some seem to think. I'm not so sure the Fed is going to raise rates very much. With rates ridiculously low, slightly higher than here is not very big of a deal in the greater scheme of things. But my sanguineness on that score does nothing to alter my view that the economy is in trouble and the dollar is in trouble, etc. The markets over-reacted to this silly statement out of the Fed, while totally disregarding a lot of other problems that exist.

At this juncture, it's not clear how much damage today's Fed news will precipitate, but one thing I can guarantee: If the markets insist on taking this news negatively, we'll hear lovey-dovey damage-control statement out of the Fed. I continue to believe that a bigger event will be next week's employment data, as I described the other day. However, when a market is as speculative as this, one always needs to pay attention to any potential weakness. I'll have a chance to talk more about what the Fed's actions mean for equities going forward.

Turning to outside markets, currencies were also whacked on the Fed's news. The euro, which had been weaker in the morning and clawed its way back to almost unchanged, wound up closing down 1.5%. The Canadian dollar was down about the same, and the yen/Aussie dollar down about 0.75%. Precious metals closed before the Fed's statement, with gold up $4.50 to $414.60, and silver up about 1% to $6.63. In after-hours trading, however, gold and silver surrendered their gains (albeit in thin trading). That's what produced the selloff in precious-metals stocks, which had been higher on the day before the Fed news.

Japan Ponders on Golden Pond

All the Fed-engendered commotion overshadowed what to me was the really big news in the longer term, both for currencies, metals, and perhaps even fixed income -- a potentially tectonic statement made by Japanese Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki. To quote a Bloomberg story: "Japan needs to 'carefully' consider diversifying its official reserves to include more holdings of gold. 'That would be necessary for the purposes of diversifying assets,' Tanigaki said at the fiscal and finance committee of the lower house of parliament in Tokyo. He was responding to a question by Jin Matsubara of the opposition Democratic Party of Japan, regarding why most of Japan's official reserves are in foreign currencies and U.S. Treasuries, rather than other assets, including gold. . . . 'There is debate among international monetary authorities about gold's role in foreign reserves,' Tanigaki said. 'Boosting holdings of gold would affect the gold market and so should be carefully considered.'"

This story made the rounds, as one might imagine, and folks were quick to do calculations about Japan's tiny sliver of reserves held in gold. If Japan were to do something along the lines of what Germany has and pro-rated it the size of their population, it would have to buy about 4,500 tons. This is of course wild conjecture. According to my sources in the metals market, the Japanese have not been doing anything yet. But if they do, a trickle will soon become the functional equivalent of the biblical flood that required Noah to build an ark, including not just the BOJ but also Japanese citizens, the Bank of China, and Chinese citizens.

Those of us who've long held Alan Greenspan's actions in disdain have continually scratched our heads as to why the Bank of Japan, the Bank of China, and others persist in lapping up dollars and mispriced Treasuries, rather than exchanging their surplus dollars for gold, which would not put pressure on the foreign exchange rate. Apparently, some brighter lights in Asia have begun to figure it out. Should this get going, the implications for precious metals would be wildly bullish. Folks would want to scoop up as much gold as they thought they could stomach, then close their eyes and not check on the price except for maybe once a month for a couple years, because that would be one powerful trend in place.

Finally, a few words regarding the tremendous amount of motion in all markets. The important thing going forward is to determine how much was noise and knee-jerk reactions, and how much of the action may possibly be the start of a new trend. My plan is to watch the dust settle in all these markets before determining what I wish to do. Today's pronouncement out of the Fed does nothing to change my view of the dollar or the metals. I am assuming there will be some weakness in those markets that I can use to add to my positions. The only question is whether to do that in the next 48 hours or the next two weeks. Bottom line: The next week or so should be a very interesting and potentially profitable time to take some action in all these markets.



To: Chispas who wrote (6383)1/28/2004 7:52:03 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Following the Money

Commercial traders in the S&P went net long last week

I’ve mentioned the activity of large commercial traders in various pieces over the past year, whether it be in relation to gold, bond or stock futures. Currently, there is an interesting shift that has taken place in stock futures that should be mentioned.

Recall that commercial traders are large funds that hold at least 1,000 contracts of the full S&P 500 futures contract. By definition, they use the futures markets for hedging purposes, and not for outright speculation (whether this is actually the case or not is questionable). For the latest reporting period, which covers the week through Tuesday, January 20th, commercial traders were shown as holding more contracts long than short, which is a shift from their recent position. The last time commercials shifted from net short to net long was in March of last year, which is why this data is getting some attention this time around.

For many months now, I have discounted the impact of this Commitments of Traders data. Over the past year or so, expirations have been having an outsized impact on the position changes, and the swift rise of the e-mini contract as a viable alternative has rendered changes in the full contract more difficult to read. Very often, commercials will become longer in the full contract but shorter in the e-mini. In fact, over the past 12 months, the correlation between changes in the full contract and changes in the e-mini has been -0.89 (out of a scale of -1 to +1). This is a very high negative correlation, and I think it’s highly doubtful this is just coincidence. There is little doubt that commercials trading the full contract are also taking positions in the e-mini, so looking at one without the other can be misleading.

However, for now, let’s just look at the full contract. Over the time this information has been available, going back to 1986, it has paid handsomely to be on the same side as the commercials. Meaning, when commercial traders were net short, the market went down more than up; when commercials were net long, the market went up more than down. For example, 16 weeks after any week in which commercial traders were net long, the S&P 500 was an average of 5.3% higher, and it was up 81% of the time. Conversely, 16 weeks after they were net short, the S&P showed an average return of minus 1.5%, and was up only 44% of the time.

Looked at another way, if one went long the S&P 500 cash index when commercial traders switched from net short to net long, then went to cash when commercials switched back to net short, $10,000 would have grown into $107,000 from 1986 – present. If one had entered a short position instead of going to cash when commercials switched to net short, then that $10,000 would have jumped to $189,000. This is compared to a buy-and-hold ending balance of $55,000. Also, the maximum drawdown one would have suffered during this time would have been much less by following the commercials than by simply buying and holding. Please note that this is not meant to be a viable trading system, and I highly discourage anyone from buying and selling based on this data alone. As I said above, for various reasons commercial behavior in this contract may not be as reliable as it used to be, not to mention the fact that there is a four-day delay in the release of the information to the public. So the positions have changed – possibly greatly – by the time you even get the data.

Still, I think it’s helpful to know that in the past, commercial traders switching to a net long position from net short has been a telling sign that higher market prices were in store. We saw that in spades just this past March, and I am watching the current situation carefully. While there are many, many extreme negatives from a sentiment standpoint, I would be remiss not to also mention the positives.



To: Chispas who wrote (6383)1/29/2004 7:52:03 AM
From: Chispas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Fiend Commentary


Top Ten Reasons Why Greenspan
Is Hinting That Interest Rates Might rise

10. Tired of getting hugged by stock brokers whenever he is out in public.

9. Fed Governor Ben Bernanke told him that he "doesn't have the guts" to
even think about raising rates during an election year.

8. Greenspan was trying to help out a friend who has been getting creamed
on his short positions for the past several months.

7. If interest rates are raised, Greenspan will have more room to cut them
later.

6. Greenspan was terrified by a dream in which he was visited by ghosts of
bubbles past.

5. Didn't think that Wall Street morons would even notice such a subtle
nuance in his comments.

4. Misses the days when a couple of words from him would rattle the
financial markets.

3. Secretly pining for a Kerry/Edwards presidency.

2. He is planning vacation in Europe this summer and would like to
get a good euro exchange rate.

1. Knows that he has another mess on his hands and is just trying to
wing his way through as usual. There is slow growth, a declining
U.S. dollar, a renewed equity bubble, continuing real estate bubble,
massive consumer debt, record U.S. budget deficits, and commodity
prices are pointing towards inflation. The last recourse to resolve
some of these issues might just be to raise interest rates.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

fiendbear.com