SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MrLucky who wrote (6411)1/29/2004 1:23:48 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
As a result of the embargo? Over 500,000 children, 1.2 million total - none of which were probably involved in WMD. Madeleine Albright said "it was worth it" to Leslie Stahl.

fair.org

I'm not sure I'd agree. And most people get irate about 5000 mostly adult casualties for WTC which DID NOT INVOLVE IRAQ but a cell of mostly Saudi terrorists operating out of Afghanistan. How we can justify this is beyond my understanding. It is the same mentality that allowed the US to bomb Vietnam and Cambodia, missing most military targets in favor of civil ones.

The politics of the Cold War prevented us from taking the war to certain places which were likely to kill Chinese or Russian advisors, possibly increasing the scope of the War. Even Robert McNamara, the hawk who drove Johnson into Vietnam now regrets it. Great. His regrets mean a lot to the people that had thousands of loved ones killed or mamed. I work with a Vietnamese guy who has obviously been disfigured by the war - most of his hand is missing. He's not old enough to have been a combatant.



To: MrLucky who wrote (6411)1/29/2004 3:53:14 PM
From: zonder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20773
 
Nobody is saying Hussein was an angel. Nobody is saying he killed less people than US/UK, either.

However, that the US invasion killed less people in Iraq than some bloody dictator does not make it OK that 9,000 civilians were massacred through a needless invasion of a country that was not a threat to the world.

Yes, it wasn't a place I would like to live in. Yes, Saddam was a bad guy responsible for many deaths.

No, all that does not excuse invading a country and killing 9,000 of its civilians in the process.

If US/UK had intervened when Saddam was gassing the Kurds at the height of his homicidal best, "He kills his own people" could be a more credible excuse. As it is, years later, it just isn't.