Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (532622)	1/30/2004 10:15:58 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Is that Ritter, the kiddie diddler.....???

To: Neocon who wrote (532622)	1/30/2004 10:22:42 AM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Bush's Impossible Math The unreal quality of the Bush administration's economic program reached new heights last week. "I believe deficits do matter," Vice President Dick Cheney declared at a summit meeting of skeptical world leaders in Davos, Switzerland, "but I'm also a great believer in the policy we followed." As the Congressional Budget Office reported this week, whether that policy of permanent tax cuts is followed or not will largely determine the size of the deficit. The CBO says the deficit is headed for a record $477 billion this year. Over the next 10 years, if the cuts become permanent, it projects a deficit of more than $5 trillion. That indebtedness would reduce annual household income by about $1,800 a year because of slowed growth. Such debt is costly to maintain, just like a chronic maximum balance on a credit card. The Federal Reserve on Wednesday held to its record-low current interest rates but warned that the 1% level can't last. The market tumbled. Pressure is mounting to raise interest rates to attract foreign investment to finance the federal debt. If — actually when — the average mortgage interest rate goes up from 6% to 7%, a family taking out a 30-year mortgage for $250,000 will owe another $2,000 a year to the lender. President Bush claims he can tame the deficit by limiting growth in spending, excluding homeland security and defense, even while making tax cuts permanent. Considering the uncounted costs of war in Iraq and the pork-laden domestic spending spree that Congress has been on, including the pharmaceutical company bonanza of the Medicare drug benefit, there is no form of math that can do what Bush predicts. As a new study by the center-left Brookings Institution shows, it will require more than reining in, for example, agriculture subsidies to begin rebalancing the budget. The study by former White House budget director Alice M. Rivlin and Brookings fellow Isabel V. Sawhill, among others, makes the obvious point that tax cuts for the top income brackets will have to be rolled back, not made permanent. Pain will also have to fall on the middle class, in speeding up higher age requirements for Social Security and higher Medicare premiums. Then come the poor, with a restructuring of Medicaid that would scale back the federal share of payments to the states. Federal revenue is drying up because of the tax cuts already in effect. Individual and corporate income taxes are expected to equal 8% of the economy this year — the lowest level since 1942. If the tax cuts are made permanent, the 1% of families with the highest incomes would receive $159 billion in breaks in 2014 alone. Congressional Republicans and Democrats can still bring the budget under control, as they did during the early 1990s. But the conclusion of the Brookings study, that the economy cannot be saved painlessly, should be what taxpayers and voters recognize as the truth. CC

To: Neocon who wrote (532622)	1/30/2004 10:42:28 AM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I have yet to see a "professinal arms inspector" who I would trust to bread chicken. Were Kay being truely honest, he would simply have to admit that: He had the job of finding out the DISPOSITION of the WMD's, NOT finding the WMD's themselves (which may just as easily have been re-possessed by the French, Germans, and Russians, who sold Saddam the wherewithall, and never got PAID.) He spent far too little time on that job to even scratch the surface. Then he got mad and QUIT when they cut his resources, after it was determined that he was useless, and the resources misallocated. And, finally-by the time he quit-he, personally, had FAILED to even develop a THEORY as to where the WMD's were sent (or hidden). Maybe we should quit giving jobs to these "specialists", and just send a few chicken breaders over there...