SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (27096)1/30/2004 1:56:47 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 793928
 
A friend of mine and his two brothers were in the National Guard and went to Korea. He was sent home after his brothers were killed.



To: Ilaine who wrote (27096)1/30/2004 3:00:21 PM
From: aladin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793928
 
CB,

Ken served in Nam and while the Guard also served it did so in such small numbers that regular army and marine units viewed the Guard as a way of dodging heavy combat. Fair or not today - that was a real impression for the guys serving in that era.

My boss when I was at Boeing joined the Navy to avoid grunt duty in Nam and was assigned to Brownwater Navy and saw a lot of pretty ugly action. Very similar to Kerry's tour.

Would this make Kerry a good President - who knows, but its nothing to sneeze at, and certainly tougher than Clinton's or Bush's experiences.

Now plenty of guys bought the farm learning to fly and flying jets - so I am not discounting Bush. Thats certainly a lot tougher than Dean or Edwards, but not at the same level as Kerry.

John

ps I support Bush



To: Ilaine who wrote (27096)1/30/2004 11:52:44 PM
From: FaultLine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793928
 
Hi CB,

Tell that to the National Guard that are presently serving in Iraq. I am sure they'd be thrilled to learn that being regular army is more honorable.


I'm simply saying that GWB's service was mighty cushy by comparison to most.