Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (9602)	1/31/2004 1:39:01 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 10965

I didn't know you were in michigan Scott? I guess I never thought about it. I agree Michigan doesn't look like there is any possibility of a Bush win there, I mean NONE... and yet sometimes you hear Bush staffers come up with real whoppers like Michigan and CA are "up for grabs". Zogby was talking economy last night not terrorism. Terrorism is of course important in any election now. But Bush already had a ding by his name on Iraq, the only way Bush could have skirted the Iraq disaster was with a perfect, Clinton type economy which I think they may have thought they had.... 3 mos ago when those GDPs first came out at 7%. Now it is more clear what the reality of this economy is and I can't see how Bush recovers from both screwups Iraq + jobloss. This is ignoring the budget fiasco.