Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (9621)	1/31/2004 3:42:18 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10965

John, I missed the $10M charge & will look into it. The Repubs yelp constantly about same old complaints they hammered into ground during Clinton Adm. Their outrages for past 3yrs might not have literally stained the oval office, but their pandering to loyalty-neutral & greedy multi-national corps with unfair NAFTA, WTO agreements are more immoral in the grand scheme of things. At least Clinton took advantage of only one young WH intern. So far, the Bush Adm has screwed millions of American workers with their downright incompetent handling of U.S. trade issues.

To: John Carragher who wrote (9621)	1/31/2004 5:08:17 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 10965

Dean is getting desperate with wild accusations. He sounds worse than Bush exaggerating the WMD's. Kerry has almost zero financial scandals, just minor stuff like living in an apartment for free for awhile when he was broke, that sort of thing. Everything else he's done vis a vis ethics in the Senate he will gladly hold up against any other Senator and come out fine by comparison. Even campaign finance reformist McCain once did Lincoln S+L a big favor and took money. Kerry has never done anything like that.