SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (533700)2/1/2004 2:40:27 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769667
 
there is over $11 billion in unrequested, unauthorized, run-of-the-mill pork projects contained in the 1,182 pages of this conference report. Let’s go through some of the more interesting provisions:

• $200,000 to the West Oahu campus of the University of Hawaii to produce the “Primal Quest” film documentary.

• $225,000 to the Wheels Museum in New Mexico.

• $7.3 million for Hawaiian Sea Turtles.

• $6 million for Sea Lions in Alaska.

• $450,000 for the Johnny Appleseed Heritage Center in Ohio.

• $100,000 to the State Historical Society of Iowa in Des Moines for the development of the World Food Prize.

• $200,000 to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum in Cleveland, Ohio, for the Rockin' the Schools education program.

• $1 million for Mormon cricket suppression in Utah.

• $450,000 for an Alaska Statehood celebration.

• $225,000 for an Hawaii statehood celebration.

• $175,000 to a city in Missouri for the painting of a mural on a flood wall.

• $90,000 for fruit fly research in Montpellier, France.

• $225,000 to Traverse City, Michigan, for the restoration of an Opera House.

• $250,000 for the Alaska Aviation Heritage Museum.

• $200,000 to the Town of Guadalupe, Arizona, for the construction and renovation of a shopping center.

• $325,000 to the City of Salinas, California, for construction of a swimming pool.

• $100,000 to the city of Macon, Georgia, for the renovation of the Coca-Cola building.

• $100,000 to the City of Atlanta for the renovation of Paschal’s restaurant and motel.

• $900,000 to an economic development association in Idaho to continue the implementation of the Lewis and Clark Bicentennial commemoration plan.

• $175,000 to the City of Detroit for the design and construction of a zoo.

• $238,000 to the National Wild Turkey Federation. Speaking of Wild Turkey - you almost need a bottle of it in order to swallow the lack of fiscal discipline in this bill.

• $200,000 for the City of North Pole, Alaska, for recreation improvements. I guess Santa had a tough year and the elves need a little help from the American taxpayer.

• $100,000 for restoration of the Jefferson County Courthouse Clock Tower in Washington State. I’m sure that this is a beautiful clock tower, but probably not what most taxpayers have in mind when they think of economic development, as this project is characterized.

• $220,000 to the Blueberry Hill Farm in Maine for renovations. For $220,000, I can only presume that somebody will be getting their thrill on Blueberry Hill!

While many of these projects may sound comical, they illustrate a badly broken system in need of serious and comprehensive reform. The HUD portion of this bill contains an account that is perhaps the best evidence that this process is out of control. The appropriators included $278 million in this bill for so-called “economic development initiatives.” Mr. President, every single dime of that $278 million was served up as pork. In 40 pages of report language, the appropriators dished out 902 earmarks for everything from theater renovations in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, to quarry upgrades in Nome, Alaska. Sadly, the EDI account in the HUD appropriations bill has become nothing more than a slush fund for the appropriators - completely eliminating any competitive or merit based determinations by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The only word that comes to mind to describe this practice is “shameful.”

At the same time, I want to comment about some language in the statement of managers language accompanying this conference report that offers a more appropriate approach. Many of the accounts throughout the Department of Justice portion of this bill contain language that allows federal officials, governors and other state and local representatives some discretion in awarding the appropriated funds. While the statement of managers names specific entities in connection with DOJ grants, it also states that funds should be awarded if they are warranted after a proper review. I certainly hope that the agency officials charged with reviewing these proposals will employ a modicum of fiscal restraint, as some projects mentioned, such as $2 million for the “First Tee” program, which teaches youths how to play golf, may not be the best use of our resources at this time.
mccain.senate.gov



To: American Spirit who wrote (533700)2/1/2004 2:41:37 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769667
 
Message 19757040 liar murderer kerryboy



To: American Spirit who wrote (533700)2/1/2004 3:30:02 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769667
 
Kerry an outsider?????

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

Kerry is the consumate insider.

Kerry Leads in Lobby Money
Anti-Special-Interest Campaign Contrasts With Funding

By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 31, 2004; Page A01

Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), who has made a fight against
corporate special interests a centerpiece of his front-running
campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, has raised
more money from paid lobbyists than any other senator over the
past 15 years, federal records show.

Kerry, a 19-year veteran of the Senate who fought and won four
expensive political campaigns, has received nearly $640,000
from lobbyists, many representing telecommunications and
financial companies with business before his committee,
according to Federal Election Commission data compiled by the
nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

For his presidential race, Kerry has raised more than $225,000
from lobbyists, better than twice as much as his nearest
Democratic rival. Like President Bush, Kerry has also turned to a
number of corporate officials and lobbyists to "bundle"
contributions from smaller donors, often in sums of $50,000 or
more, records provided by his campaign show.

"Senator Kerry has taken individual contributions from lobbyists,
but that has not stopped him from fighting against special
interests on behalf of average Americans," said Kerry
spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter. "If anyone thinks a contribution
can buy Kerry's vote, then they are wasting their money."

Kerry said on Jan. 19 that he would "happily release any
lobbyist meeting I've ever had," but he has yet to do so. Cutter
said Kerry will not release records until he compiles data on
every meeting over the past 19 years, which will be a "pretty
lengthy process." Kerry will not release it "piecemeal," she said.

Most members of Congress and presidential candidates turn to
corporations and their Washington-based lobbyists for political
assistance, most often with fundraising. All the presidential
candidates take money from special interests, including Sen.
John Edwards (D-N.C.), who like Kerry has targeted corporations
and lobbyists in his stump speeches. And Bush has far outpaced
them all.

Because Kerry has made his fight against "Washington special
interests" a new theme of his presidential campaign, campaign
rivals and campaign finance watchdogs have accused him of
hypocrisy.

Retired Army Gen. Wesley K. Clark, a newcomer to national
politics, is running a television ad that hits Kerry and others for
ties to special interests. "Special interest deals. Promises unkept.
Do we really need another Washington politician?" the narrator
says in the ad. "A politician won't change the way Washington
works."

"John Kerry has been withdrawing money from the special
interest bank for his entire career and now -- because it's the
popular thing to do -- he wants us to believe that he's going to
close the account and go after the people that have funded his
political career," said Jay Carson, a spokesman for former
Vermont governor Howard Dean.

"The note of reality is he has been brought to you by special
interests," said Charles Lewis of the nonpartisan Center for
Public Integrity, a watchdog group that has closely studied the
senator's relationship with special interests. "It's very hard [for
Kerry] to utter this rhetoric without some hollowness to it."

"I think it's harder for someone like Kerry to take on" Bush over
special interests "because he's taken money . . . from a lot of the
same" corporate sectors, added Larry Noble, executive director of
the Center for Responsive Politics, which monitors money in
politics. Dean, who has raised more money than Kerry in this
campaign, has taken considerably less from lobbyists.



To: American Spirit who wrote (533700)2/1/2004 3:43:00 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
And you opposed Macho Man every step of the way didn't you?

You going to say "No"?

If you do, I will pull the posts to prove you a liar.